Ron Hunter wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> One of the problems with emailing a group is that it is poor netiquette
>> to expose the addresses of your contacts to other people without the
>> explicit permission of each individual address to be giving that address
>> to anyone else.
>> To prevent that exposure, as a general rule the group list should be put
>> into the BCC instead of the To or CC.
>>
>> That strategy by itself does not provide the nicety of populating the To
>> with something, which something I think should identify in some way the
>> group of recipients.
> My wife has some mailing lists set up, and they are all Bcc lists. What
> appears in the address is 'undisclosed recipients'. I would rather it
> display the name she has given the group.
A useful method for solving that problem is to create a new contact
which has a descriptive name for the group list and to populate that
'group contact name' with the address of the list sender.
Then the description of the group will appear in the To instead of
undisclosed recipients but all of the list members are hidden in the BCC.
In addition to doing that, when I send a group mail to several friends
who know each others names, in the body of the mail I put 'sent to' and
give the names of the friends so that the other friends will know who
all I sent the mail to.
I don't like it when someone sends me an email saying Undisclosed
recipients that they sent to some of their other friends I know but not
others and I don't know who got the mail and who didn't.
There are many netiquette nuances to this 'group list' business.
> Rude, or not, I really like seeing the addresses so that I can harvest
> emails for old friends, and out of touch family members.
I understand the concept, and sometimes 'in the balance of things', the
exposure of private information to some other has value that is
'unexpected' such as when someone dies and having some of their private
information works to a benefit that they didn't expect.
> I do have a few friends who request their address not be displayed,
> but they are rather few, and far between.
That is because their are ten or more people for every one who makes
such a request who wish that you didn't expose their address, but don't
want to say so.
Most of my friends consider it rude to give group list senders advice
about how to address their social spam re such as To and BCC. They also
consider it rude to tell some friend who is a real pest about forwarding
them social spam crap they don't want, so they just abide it without
requesting anything.
> I do try to honor their requests, usually by just
> copying the text of the email and sending it to them only.
IMO you are doing it wrong/ly.
I think we are still ontopic for Tbird and its addressbook.
--
Mike Easter