In message of 2013-1217 06:52 -0500, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> Reply List is for a listserve. This is a News group. You use Reply or Followup.
>>>
>>> This is also a Listserve. And a Google Group. All three methods may be
>>> used to access.
First, just to re-clarify: My original post noted both mailing list and
newsgroup headers, which is the first time I have seen that configuration
(though, as I noted then, it makes sense to have access to the same content
via either method). Also, I joined a mailing list via the TB support page
<
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-thunderbird>, which gives not
indication that the same list content is also available as a newsgroup. So
the original question was how this dual-access arrangement is supposed to
work, especially from the mailing list side, as that is how I joined.
>> Now I _am_ intrigued: What _three_ methods? As I compose this reply (via
>> Reply-to-List), I see two headers:
>> To:
support-t...@lists.mozilla.org
>> Newsgroups: mozilla.support.thunderbird [which I will need to remove when TB complains about it]
>>
>> What other method is there? Aren't Google Groups listserves (mailing lists)?
>
> 1. NNTP connection to
news.mozilla.org using a Usenet newsreader such as
> the Thunderbird you are currently using. In your Account Settings, set up
> an account there and subscribe to the groups of choice. This method is the
> most efficient of the three.
That I know; I refer again to the original post, summarized above.
> 2. Emailing to the Listserver address you are familiar with, and receiving
> replies via email messages.
Again, ibid.
> 3. Using Google Groups for mozilla.support.thunderbird (and others). Don't
> ask me how to do that; I despise Google Groups. GG is *not* a listserve or
> a mailing list.
AFAICS, it appears that Google Groups use mail, as opposed to news or some
other, protocols.
>> IAC, list admin Chris Ilias is looking into this problem, so I expect we
>> will know soon.
>
> Chris is not the only knowledgeable person participating in this newsgroup.
Of course not; that was not the point. The reference to Chris is that he
said I should not be seeing what I am seeing (presumably meaning that I
should not see both mail and news headers), and that he would find out what
was going on - so he will be back with an explanation and fix.
Thanks for your follow-up.
--
John