Old Gringo, its version 2.0.0.21. (I hope they did not flog you a
second-hand old version!)
> Thank You to the Mozilla Thunderbird team for another flawless
> update. Job well done.
Not so flawlessly here. Just like the last auto-update, TB couldn't touch
MapiProxy.dll or mozMapi.dll. I had to resort to downloading the latest
version for a manual update, and TB still got stuck at those files. They
aren't read-only. It was only after I rename them that the update was able
to proceed. It's the weirdest darn thing.
--
Mike "Rocket J Squirrel"
Bend, Oregon
Perhaps he's a Blackjack enthusiast.
Hi Mike,
See here,
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Thunderbird_2.0_installation_issues
Terry R.
--
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
I got an error message about files that could not be loaded, but it
didn't specify what. When I started it again, it went through install
again, and seemed to complete o.k. Not noticing any problems, nor
anything new and exciting. Would frankly prefer these updates to be
optional, as for Firefox, but I was not given the option to choose to
not install this version. Or rather when I said "not now", it said
"O.k., next time you restart Thunderbird then".
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:54:31 -0700, mike elliott
Tools, Options, Advanced, Update tab. You have yours set to auto
download if that's what's happening.
> The date and time was Thu Mar 19 2009 12:54:31 GMT-0700 (Pacific
> Daylight Time), and on a whim, mike elliott pounded out on the keyboard:
>
>> On 3/19/2009 8:35 AM Old Gringo wrote:
>>
>>> Thank You to the Mozilla Thunderbird team for another flawless
>>> update. Job well done.
>> Not so flawlessly here. Just like the last auto-update, TB couldn't touch
>> MapiProxy.dll or mozMapi.dll. I had to resort to downloading the latest
>> version for a manual update, and TB still got stuck at those files. They
>> aren't read-only. It was only after I rename them that the update was able
>> to proceed. It's the weirdest darn thing.
>>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> See here,
> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Thunderbird_2.0_installation_issues
>
> Terry R.
Thanks, Terry, been through that list before, the last time I updated TB.
None of the possible causes detailed fit my configuration.
It baffles science.
I was running 2.0.0.19 when TB attempted a 'partial' update to 2.0.0.21.
After re-starting TB, I got the message that certain files could not
be updated, and this repeated every time I re-started TB, or selected
the option in the Help menu to install the downloaded update.
I renamed MapiProxy.dll and mozMapi32.dll, and again clicked on the Help
menu option. This time the message stated that the partial upload could
not be installed, and then the complete latest version (8+ Mb) was
downloaded. This installed OK on re-start.
I do not have a webcam of any sort. There was no previous prompt to
update to 2.0.0.20. The Help menu option has reverted to 'Check for
Updates'.
XP Pro SP3.
--
Peter Lawson
Cape Town: 021-797-4493
France 06 18 28 96 43
--
Ron Hunter rphu...@charter.net
Tbird update seems to be set to automatically update by default
but that can be changed in Tools-Options-Advanced-Update. I have
mine set to "Ask Me What I want to Do" when it finds an update.
Since Tbird 3.0+is in beta I suspect the majority of further
updates to TBird 2.0 are security updates.
Ann W.
--
Ron Hunter rphu...@charter.net
The Gecko 1.8.1.x branch (Thunderbird 2.0.0.x series) will not include any groundbreaking features that Gecko 1.9.x will bring, since it is based on Gecko 1.8.
Impact key for security issues listed on the Mozilla Foundation Security Advisories webpage:
* Critical: Vulnerability can be used to run attacker code and install software, requiring no user interaction beyond normal browsing.
* High: Vulnerability can be used to gather sensitive data from sites in other windows or inject data or code into those sites, requiring no more than normal browsing actions.
* Moderate: Vulnerabilities that would otherwise be High or Critical except they only work in uncommon non-default configurations or require the user to perform complicated and/or unlikely steps.
* Low: Minor security vulnerabilities such as Denial of Service attacks, minor data leaks, or spoofs. (Undetectable spoofs of SSL indicia would have “High” impact because those are generally used to steal sensitive data intended for other sites.)
Changes in 2.0.0.21: (6)
Security issues: (3)
* Fixed: MFSA 2009-07 - Crashes with evidence of memory corruption (rv:1.9.0.7) (Critical)
* Fixed: MFSA 2009-10 - Upgrade PNG library to fix memory safety hazards (Critical)
* Fixed: MFSA 2009-09 - XML data theft via RDFXMLDataSource and cross-domain redirect (Moderate)
Other fixes: (3)
* Fixed: 382349 - Unable to shift focus to the Message Body Pane with keyboard (F-6), a problem for blind Users.
* Fixed: 470185 - Update mail/ copyright dates to 2009
* Fixed: 473924 - thunderbird crashes when trying to open a base64 encode vcard [@ fakeCString]
Expectations for any substantial improvement in the 2.x.x.x series will not be realized.
As a matter of fact, sooner or later, you will probably be faced with a "major update" that you might not recognize.
The future is in TB3, so you might as well take a look at one of the betas now.
http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/
JoeS
[ ... ]
> One thing I have noticed right away, it that when reading a thread
> in USENET some of the posts use to open in a new window with a
> single click. That seems to be gone. ??
Tools --> Options --> Advanced --> [General tab]
Open new messages in:
( ) A new message window (x) An existing message window
It sounds as if you might have had "new" checked in your older
version, but this version has "existing" checked. If so, try checking
"new" and see if that does what you're used to.
Ken Whiton
--
FIDO: 1:132/152
InterNet: kenw...@surfglobal.net.INVAL (remove the obvious to reply)
--
Ron Hunter rphu...@charter.net
Results may vary, but many extensions DO work. You just need to
override the version check.
The most controlled way to do this is one at a time, using nightly
tester tools extension
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/6543
Prerelease questions are handled primarily in
mozilla.feedback.thunderbird.prerelease and you can find related
information at http://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Testing
> On 19.03.2009 19:01, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Old Gringo to
> generate the following:? :
>> In The Beginning God Created The Heavens And Earth, Then I Added My
>> Two Cents To The kes Post:
>>
>>> Old Gringo wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank You to the Mozilla Thunderbird team for another flawless
>>>> update. Job well done.
>>>>
>>> Old Gringo, its version 2.0.0.21. (I hope they did not flog you a
>>> second-hand old version!)
>>>
>> Thanks anyway grand job as it keeps getting better.
>>
>>
> hmmmm - you've had the latest version all of 10 minutes - what do you
> find so good about it, that your previous version /didn't/ have ??
It's got a higher version number? :-)
--
Best regards
Gord McFee
Doing/enabling *all*, especially if you have a many extensions, leaves
you vulnerable to unplanned problems. In addition, MR Tech Toolkit
itself doesn't keep up with Thunderbird versions. I have used MR Tech
successfully in the past, however I find NTT better to use, and less
cluttering, for daily use.
MR Tech Toolkit allows you to selectively make extensions compatible.
It's not all or nothing (though it may provide that option).
Also, I can't remember the last time it "didn't keep up"...
It is an impressive tool so my hats off to the author and those who use
it. I used it for quite a while myself. And If it allows selective
enabling so much the better.
> Also, I can't remember the last time it "didn't keep up"...
Sorry. I don't mean function-wise, I mean the fact that it's Max version
lags at times for users of trunk builds.
yes.. well... wondering what about 3.0b2 might be so wow? or superb? or
not...
--
... If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice
tagline brought to you by
* TagZilla 0.066bw * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org
i merely asked what you said wow about? to post a wow comment... with
out providing any reason behind it... makes some of us wonder what you
it is you are liking ?
provide context please...
--
... If at first you don't succeed, try management.
Personal attack removed, as per
<http://www.mozilla.org/community/cancellation.html>.
--
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
List-owner: support-firefox, support-thunderbird, test-multimedia
Keeper of the Knowledge Base: <https://support.mozilla.com/kb/>