I've changed my 'nym.

[Wolf K.]

Was Greywolf >> Wolf K.

K is Kirchmeir
--
Best,
Wolf K.

[Lu Wei]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-10-9 7:23, Wolf K. wrote:
> Was Greywolf >> Wolf K.
>
> K is Kirchmeir

A PGP signature could add more credibility if it really matters.

- --
Regards,
Lu Wei
PGP key ID: 0x92CCE1EA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJVFIwACgkQoS/vdZLM4erCcACcCHC3JGWQXEX9rZOWm/c4iYO4
IHkAn1jIYr/85sbIB5TUxNG0K9bfz2Gz
=kX2I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Mike Easter]

Lu Wei wrote:
> Wolf K. wrote:

>> Was Greywolf >> Wolf K.
>>
>> K is Kirchmeir
>
> A PGP signature could add more credibility if it really matters.

- I disagree with the usage of pgp/gpg clearsigning for routine
newsgroup messages
- in this case, the moz news server stamps an NPH which consistency is
quite adequate to connect/attach the regular persona Was Greywolf to the
new persona Wolf K., ie NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.92.64.254
- an essential element in the concept of identity verification is a
web of trust to attach such as a key ID and its associated public key to
an identity -- it is useless/misguided for Wolf or Lu Wei to clearsign
something if no one reading is holding the appropriate public key
obtained by way of a proper web of trust
- that being said, I believe there ARE (other/elsewhere) appropriate
places and usages for the use of gpg/pgp clearsigning

AND

- your sig delimiter is b0rken, it should be dash dash space


x-posting this to .general and f/ups there as a conversation on this
philosophy isn't directly related to Tb support


--
Mike Easter