/"Don't buy condoms at a BP station."/ - Stephen Colbert
> TB 3.1.3 still hasn't solved the annoyance of having the next email
> (text window) disappear when closing the one above it (the prior
> message). This has been going on since TB 3 came out. Seems only to
> affect the Mac OS.
I don't understand the question - might you rephrase it?
You say "still hasn't solved" - have you been to this group before?
How do you view your mail - open in its own window?
And you close that window and the nest message in the header pane just
disappears?
Is the problem mentioned in this article -
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Disappearing_mail?
> Is the problem mentioned in this article -
> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Disappearing_mail
Some of us have the opposite problem -- not being able
to make selected individual (news) messages disappear.
If this new phenomenon can be reproduced,
perhaps it can be a new work-around for the old problem :)
--
OP said email, not news.
You /can/ delete your email...
OK, you have a list of mail in the "mail pane" (don't know what else to
call it). You click on the first unread message and it appears in the
"message pane." When you delete that message, the next in line flashes
open in the message pane, then disappears. If you click on that message
in the "mail pane" you get it back in the message pane and you are back
in business. It used to be, before TB 3 (when this issue first surfaced
on my Mac) that the next message did not do its disappearing act.
Not sure what more I can say.
> On 9/1/10 12:28 PM, goodwin wrote:
>> On 08/31/2010 09:32 PM Steve scribbled:
>>
>>> TB 3.1.3 still hasn't solved the annoyance of having the next email
>>> (text window) disappear when closing the one above it (the prior
>>> message). This has been going on since TB 3 came out. Seems only to
>>> affect the Mac OS.
>> I don't understand the question - might you rephrase it?
>> You say "still hasn't solved" - have you been to this group before?
>>
>> How do you view your mail - open in its own window?
>> And you close that window and the nest message in the header pane just
>> disappears?
>>
>> Is the problem mentioned in this article -
>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Disappearing_mail?
>>
> I'll try to rephrase. First, this is an intermittent occurrence.
>
> OK, you have a list of mail in the "mail pane" (don't know what else to
> call it). You click on the first unread message and it appears in the
> "message pane." When you delete that message, the next in line flashes
> open in the message pane, then disappears. If you click on that message
> in the "mail pane" you get it back in the message pane and you are back
> in business. It used to be, before TB 3 (when this issue first surfaced
> on my Mac) that the next message did not do its disappearing act.
>
> Not sure what more I can say.
>
are you using Kapersky AV?
using a firewall?
usng any message filters?
> OP said email, not news.
> You /can/ delete your email...
Well I say, anything you can find that might also help news
would be a boon :) <=== (and see that symbol there)
There is also an option
Reading & Display > Close message window on delete
This option does _not_ work (tab stays open and next message appears)
in 3.0.6 on Win XP -- perhaps it actually _does_ work on MacOS ?
--
> On 9/1/2010 7:58 PM, goodwin wrote:
>
>> OP said email, not news.
>> You /can/ delete your email...
>
> Well I say, anything you can find that might also help news
> would be a boon :) <=== (and see that symbol there)
>
> There is also an option
> Reading & Display > Close message window on delete
I can only surmise that that works only when messages are opened in
their own window.
>
> This option does _not_ work (tab stays open and next message appears)
> in 3.0.6 on Win XP -- perhaps it actually _does_ work on MacOS ?
>
Now you're talking tabs - don't use them myself. However, you show
using 3.0.6, which is a tad buggy to start with - part of reason why 3.1
came along so fast. I were you, I'd step up to 3.1.x or step down to
2.x. Can't say what was fixed in 3.1 myself - it has its own foibles
but is much better than the 3.0 I tried some time ago.
But you have to know this already - why do you stay at 3.0?
I have seen this happen if TB is performing a task in the background
while loading the next message. The message will appear briefly, then,
when TB finishes whatever it was doing (usually compacting folders in my
case) the display reverts to a blank message pane and the target email
unselected. I suspect that it is due to TB reindexing the folder after
compacting, and in the process losing track of the last selected
message. I doubt that anything can be done to "remedy" the situation.
Dave
> Why do you stay at 3.0[.6]?
Because I read the experiences of 3.1, on this newsgroup :)
Continuous productivity is important to some folks,
and many a "new version" steers users right off the road instead
(just as at Opera, which is why I'm [temporarily] using TB for news),
so I'll let everyone else be the guinea pig,
and wait for something that's been fixed and finally stable.
--
I'm using Thunderbird 3.1.2 on Mac 10.6.4, and I don't have that problem.
If you close Thunderbird, then hold down the <option> key when you start
it, it should start in Thunderbird Safe Mode [1]. Does the problem still
occur in Safe Mode?
[1]<http://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode>
--
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
List-owner: support-firefox, support-thunderbird, test-multimedia
I had decided that I wasn't going to upgrade until you seemed satisfied.
I have a number of POP accounts. Can you offer a FAQ of sorts about what
I should do when upgrading, and what settings (in the Option UI or in
about:config) that I ought to change. And, is there any way to prevent
indexing. I've got a number of decent sized boxes (all compacted), and I
do not want to fall into the"indexing forever" trap if possible.
Regards and thank you,
Bill B
I'll let Ron do the FAQ.
As far as indexing goes, tools>options>advanced>general
make sure global search and indexer is unchecked.
Other settings would be changed per your own preference - best to just
go through the options and see what you want and don't want - tabs and
indexing were just about all I had to shut off - mind the new account
wizard on install, you may have to throttle it to stop it from assuming
IMAP email but that isn't dangerous, just annoying.
The first thing you will probably want to do after you start TB3 is to
shut down the indexing if you don't want to use it. If you have small
inbox(s), it probably won't make much difference, but if you are one of
us who often lets his inbox grow to several gigabytes, you probably
won't want indexing to run.
Tools/options/advanced/general tab will give you settings for the
indexing options.
> On 9/2/10 11:38 AM, goodwin wrote:
>> On 09/02/2010 10:49 AM John H Meyers scribbled:
>>
>>> On 9/1/2010 7:58 PM, goodwin wrote:
>>>
>>>> OP said email, not news.
>>>> You /can/ delete your email...
>>> Well I say, anything you can find that might also help news
>>> would be a boon :)<=== (and see that symbol there)
>>>
>>> There is also an option
>>> Reading& Display> Close message window on delete
>> I can only surmise that that works only when messages are opened in
>> their own window.
>>
>>> This option does _not_ work (tab stays open and next message appears)
>>> in 3.0.6 on Win XP -- perhaps it actually _does_ work on MacOS ?
>>>
>> Now you're talking tabs - don't use them myself. However, you show
>> using 3.0.6, which is a tad buggy to start with - part of reason why 3.1
>> came along so fast. I were you, I'd step up to 3.1.x or step down to
>> 2.x. Can't say what was fixed in 3.1 myself - it has its own foibles
>> but is much better than the 3.0 I tried some time ago.
>>
>> But you have to know this already - why do you stay at 3.0?
>>
> I am using 3.1.3! Why TB says NOT is a mystery to me!
>
I was talking to another poster, Steve, and apologize for using your
thread...
oh well, elsewhere then...
I'd say the same. If you are using 3.X there is pretty much no reason
for it to be 3.1.x. If you were using 2.X then I would hesitate to move
to 3.1.X
Timo Pietilä
>If you are using 3.X there is pretty much no reason
> for it to be 3.1.x.
to be -> not to be.
Brain is faster than hand again.
Timo Pietilä
Thank you, goodwin. I understood that TB3 immediately launched into
indexing and there was no real opportunity to shut it off. Has that changed?
Bill B
Two reasons AFAIAC:
- Subscribing in News-group remains case sensitive; if there is a valid
reason for this, I would be glad to know it. Small thing, but makes life
more complicated.
- Message attachments cannot be highlighted with the mouse, making
individual selection needlessly clumsy.
I have very little to complain about 3.0.6. The (temporary!) occasional
vanishing act of emails after deletion in the Inbox, although it should
not happen, is the only inconvenience I encountered. It seems to be a
video problem and it does not impact the integrity of the emails.
Besides, I am not convinced of the usefulness of the new Quick Filter bar.
--
John Doue
Thank you, Ron, very much. I responded to goodwin with a question on
indexing. You refer to it also. Does the install routine give the chance
to turn indexing off before it starts indexing?
Bill B
Thank you, much appreciated, Ron.
Bill B
Uneventful so far, thank you again for your help.
Bill B
>> There is also an option
>> Reading & Display > Close message window on delete
> Wow!! That's a new one. Can't find "close message window on delete."
Tools > Options > Advanced
Reading & Display > Close message window on delete
Has never worked for me (next message always appears instead,
in place of the one deleted) -- should it work only for
messages opened in separate windows,
and not for messages opened in separate tabs?
--
>Thank you, goodwin. I understood that TB3 immediately launched into
>indexing and there was no real opportunity to shut it off.
What's so bad about indexing?
I was not making a qualitative statement. It was a matter of not wanting
it. I have no use for it. I've never failed to find what I want using
Search Messages. So far...
Bill B
If indexing "locks up" TB for anyone,
then turning it off before starting TB would seem useful.
As to turning it off before starting TB,
do we know where that setting is stored, and in what file?
--
> If indexing "locks up" TB for anyone,
> then turning it off before starting TB would seem useful.
>
> As to turning it off before starting TB,
> do we know where that setting is stored, and in what file?
You could use a browser (or some other method) and go offline before
starting Tbird and not let it go online.
Then you could disable Global Search and Indexer here - screenshot
http://peek.snipr.com/11ai2e
... and you could disable Message Synchronization function here -
screenshot http://peek.snipr.com/11ai5l
Screenshots from this article
http://perfprotector.blogspot.com/2010/08/thunderbird-3-is-it-really-all-yours.html
The conditions as outlined in the article were 'favorable' to
demonstrate the problem and thus promote the blog's freeware product -
<q> What went wrong from version 2 to 3? How bad it is? - To understand
the exact problem we reproduced it in our lab. We set up Linux (Ubuntu)
and Windows (XP, Vista and 7) machines and tested them first with
Thunderbird 2 (version 2.0.0.24) and then with Thunderbird 3 (versions
3.0 and 3.1.1). On each machine we configured a GMAIL IMAP account with
a real mailbox that has about 9,000 e-mails from the last 4 years where
the total size of the mailbox was less than 5 GB. This mailbox reflects
an activity of about 5 e-mails per day with an average size of about
500KB per e-mail. </q>
But considering that so many people are going to have a gmail account
with a lot of mail and considering that Tbird wants to IMAP the person
new to Tbird but 'old' to gmail, the 'threat' of the conditions
described in the article is very very real, not just 'manufactured' by
the researchers to make Tbird look bad.
--
Mike Easter
> On 9/3/2010 5:43 PM, Andrew Price wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:51:50 -0400, Bill Braun<m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you, goodwin. I understood that TB3 immediately launched into
>>> indexing and there was no real opportunity to shut it off.
>>
>> What's so bad about indexing?
It takes hours the first time it happens. When you're not expecting it
it's terrifying -- What's wrong with my machine? Is my ISP down? What
am I doing in the background that makes everything so slow? Maybe if I
reboot...
> I was not making a qualitative statement. It was a matter of not wanting
> it. I have no use for it. I've never failed to find what I want using
> Search Messages. So far...
I wish it were possible to search all accounts simultaneously -- I've
got half a dozen and it's a real pain to have to search each one
individually.
I finally set it to compact if it will save 300K. I feel much better now.
--
Cheers, Bev
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Screw the end users. If they want good software,
let them write it themselves." -- Anon.
I wish it were possible to search all accounts simultaneously -- I've got half a dozen and it's a real pain to have to search each one individually.
-- Regards, Irné Barnard
Eudora has always had the ability to perform any search
over any or all mailboxes at once, without indexing anything,
by simply marking, on a "folder tree," all the mailboxes to search
(marking a higher level means "and all lower,"
just as in many similar "tree controls")
This simply searches through each marked folder in turn,
sparing the user from ever having to repeat the same search
on one folder at a time, and enabling final global sorting
on any result column (e.g. subject, To/From, date).
A _much faster_ search feature, from x1.com,
was offered in Eudora version 7 -- this feature operated
by creating a huge index, but was not _required_
to perform sophisticated searches of all kinds.
Other user-minded qualities of Eudora's "X1" indexer:
o Runs as a "background" task.
o Pauses whenever the user is actively working on anything.
--