Re: Patch For QuickTime
Matt Nordhoff
> http://isc.sans.org/diary.php
>
> Patched version is 7.0.4
>
> Here is the link:
>
> http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
>
> Since QT is widely used as a plugin for Moz products I felt this was the
> best of the new newsgroups to post in ...I hope I was right!? :)
<URL:http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1033>
:-P
Hmm, well, I don't use QuickTime. I don't think it's available on Linux,
anyway. :-P
--
Yay!
gwtc
> :) Wish I didn't use it..on Win XP Home SP2. ;)
>
you can always get the Alternative Quicktime:
http://www.free-codecs.com/download/QuickTime_Alternative.htm. A
great little program. From there, you can also get the Media Player
Classic and Real [Player] Alternative. Again, a couple of great
little programs.
Brian J. Graham
Thanks! I'll take a look. :)
--
Brian
. No keyboard found. Press F1 to continue.
Chris Ilias
> http://isc.sans.org/diary.php
>
> Patched version is 7.0.4
>
> Here is the link:
>
> http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
>
> Since QT is widely used as a plugin for Moz products I felt this was the
> best of the new newsgroups to post in ...I hope I was right!? :)
Just to reiterate the purpose of this newsgroup:
User support discussion regarding any Mozilla product that does not have
its own newsgroup.
Or as stated in <http://www.mozilla.org/community/newsgroups.txt>:
"All other products".
So it you were worried about multi-posting, don't worry. :-)
--
Chris Ilias - Mozilla Champion
(Please do not email me tech support questions)
Mozilla Help <http://mozillahelp.com>
Netscape 7 Help <http://ilias.ca/netscape/>
Brian J. Graham
> _Brian J. Graham_ spoke thusly on 11/01/2006 4:46 PM:
>> http://isc.sans.org/diary.php
>>
>> Patched version is 7.0.4
>>
>> Here is the link:
>>
>> http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
>>
>> Since QT is widely used as a plugin for Moz products I felt this was
>> the best of the new newsgroups to post in ...I hope I was right!? :)
>
> Just to reiterate the purpose of this newsgroup:
> User support discussion regarding any Mozilla product that does not have
> its own newsgroup.
> Or as stated in <http://www.mozilla.org/community/newsgroups.txt>:
> "All other products".
>
> So it you were worried about multi-posting, don't worry. :-)
Ahhh...Thanks Chris! :)
Brian J. Graham
Patched version is 7.0.4
Here is the link:
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
Since QT is widely used as a plugin for Moz products I felt this was the
best of the new newsgroups to post in ...I hope I was right!? :)
Brian J. Graham
:) Wish I didn't use it..on Win XP Home SP2. ;)
Moz Champion (Dan)
> Matt Nordhoff wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Since QT is widely used as a plugin for Moz products I felt this was
>>> the best of the new newsgroups to post in ...I hope I was right!? :)
>>
>>
>> <URL:http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1033>
>>
>> :-P
>>
>> Hmm, well, I don't use QuickTime. I don't think it's available on
>> Linux, anyway. :-P
>
>
> :) Wish I didn't use it..on Win XP Home SP2. ;)
>
I use QuickTime, but on a Mac it comes standard anyway, so its
essentially different. This one is only for OS X 10.3.9 (or later)
anyway, not applicable on this machine.
Personally tho, I think Brian chose the right group, it is a general
interest item
Getting used to no split OS groups might take a while
Matt Nordhoff
> Just to reiterate the purpose of this newsgroup:
> User support discussion regarding any Mozilla product that does not have
> its own newsgroup.
> Or as stated in <http://www.mozilla.org/community/newsgroups.txt>:
> "All other products".
>
> So it you were worried about multi-posting, don't worry. :-)
QuickTime and the QuickTime plugins are not Mozilla products, but since
the QuickTime plugin is used by multiple Mozilla products, it is useful
to warn people about a problem and fixed update to it. :-)
--
Yay!
Chris Ilias
I know. What I'm saying is that it would have been okay to multi-post
it. :-)
Matt Nordhoff
> I know. What I'm saying is that it would have been okay to multi-post
> it. :-)
Okies. :-)
--
Yay!
Sean
One is a Cisco ACS appliance and the other is a eFax.
Both send emails constantly but are dated 12/31/1969.
I opened the headers and the correct date is in the header.
Anyone know why these specific emails would display a different
date and time stamp in my email in box other than whats in the
header of the email. Here is an example of a good header.
Return-path: <smi...@costuless.com>
Received: from 10.10.210.11 by costuless.com (MDaemon PRO v9.0.1)
with ESMTP id md50000979531.msg for <smi...@costuless.com>; Tue, 27 Jun
2006 11:12:51 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: SEAN MILLER <smi...@costuless.com>
Subject:
To: SEAN MILLER <smi...@costuless.com>
X-HP-DIGITAL_SENDER: HP Digital Sender Service
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=cMc_xLc_8iL08i205U.41c67ea6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Processed: costuless.com, Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:12:51 -0700
(not processed: message size (36922) exceeds max size (25600))
X-MDRcpt-To: smi...@costuless.com
X-Rcpt-To: smi...@costuless.com
X-MDRemoteIP: 10.10.210.11
X-Return-Path: smi...@costuless.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: smi...@costuless.com
gwtc
--
Amazingly Simple Home Remedies . . .
If you are choking on an ice cube, don't panic! Simply pour a cup of
boiling water down your throat and presto! The blockage will be almost
instantly removed.
Daniel
gw, did you notice both the From: and To: are from Sean and Sean is
asking about the problem, so I think he has let him know what's going on!
Daniel
Lou
Uh Sean is giving us an example. Both problems sound like a wrong date
at either the other end or the mail server.
--
Lou
Do something good for the world!
These folks have a system that uses the time your machine would be
idling showing a screen saver to do something good.
NO spam or malware. http://www.grid.org/projects/hpf/
Daniel
OK!!
Daniel