Lynn McGuire wrote:
> This is one of the most visited sites on the web.
601 according to
alexa.com.
google.com is number one.
> The site is continuously refreshing, is this the site or FF. Also,
> advertising seems to be having problems with taking over the view for
> the webpage and not allowing the hyperlinks to show up properly.
I have the Flash add-on configured to "Ask". That means a placeholder
is shown on the page or an infobar pops up asking if I want to run the
Flash content. I can then choose to see it or not. Makes page display
faster without the nuisance or distraction of Flash content that I do
not want to see.
I also have Ghostery installed. Far less a hog on memory than using
AdBlock Plus because its blacklist is much smaller but proven to be
nearly 98% as Adblock Plus. Ghostery blocked 12 tracker/ad sources on
their home page.
Have you revisited that web page (after flushing the TIF cache) since
first noticing the problem? I notice their web page has:
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
var timer = setInterval("autoRefresh()", 1000 * 47 * 3);
function autoRefresh(){self.location.reload(true);}
//-->
</script>
Seems pretty stupid to define a script that refreshes the page every 141
seconds [or whatever is the timer's granularity] to then just comment it
out (between the "<!--" and "//-->" lines). Perhaps they intended the
refresh to occur according to some event, fucked up, and for now decided
to comment it out. Later they call the autorefresh() function using:
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
// ads breaking timetimer
if (typeof timer == 'undefined') {
var timer = setInterval("autoRefresh()", 1000 * 60 * 3);
function autoRefresh(){self.location.reload(true);}
}
//-->
</script>
So they were refreshing their page to update the ads. Perhaps each
refresh would offer a different set of ads. However, they commented out
that script, too. They intended something to happen, didn't know how to
code for it, used something that worked but also had bad side effects,
and they commented it all out and will have to figure out something else
for their ad management.
So load a *fresh* copy of their web page to see if the problem still
occurs.