Sounds like we have agreement to move the content of the inline notes into
the footnotes. This makes the in-line notes part of the API unnecessary
and we can remove it :)
Thanks,
Stephanie.
SOn Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Jeremie Patonnier <
jeremie....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2015-01-22 19:54 GMT+01:00 Stephanie Hobson <
sho...@mozilla.com>:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Jeremie Patonnier <
>>
jeremie....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2015-01-22 1:07 GMT+01:00 Stephanie Hobson <
sho...@mozilla.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Recommendation: Move the content of the inline-notes into footnotes,
>>>> remove the "notes" field from the API entirely,
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about that. How do we plan to store aside information and
>>> how to retrieve them if they are removed from the API?
>>>
>>
>> If you agree that we can move the content of the inline-notes into the
>> footnotes what information would we be left to be stored in the
>> inline-notes field?
>>
>
> Oh! Okay, there is a difference between inline-note end footnote in the
> API. I wasn't aware of such difference. I was thinking we only had
> (foot/inline-)notes (wherever they are displayed). As long as we have a
> relation between a feature and some notes, making the API simpler is okay :)
> --
> Jeremie
> .............................
> Web :
http://jeremie.patonnier.net
> Twitter : @JeremiePat <
http://twitter.com/JeremiePat>
>