Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Distributing firefox with preset home page

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Jan Schejbal

unread,
Feb 19, 2009, 11:47:23 AM2/19/09
to
Is it allowed to redistribute Firefox with a different home (start)
page as default, and still call it firefox?

http://www.foxload . com/firefox-de.html (link made unclickable) is
doing exactly that. A quick test in a VM showed no other nasty things,
but someone distributing outdated firefox versions from a
official-looking, adwords-advertised site as a kind of "adware" does
not exactly meet my definition of ethical behaviour.

--
Please avoid sending mails, use the group instead.
If you really need to send me an e-mail, mention "FROM NG"
in the subject line, otherwise my spam filter will delete your mail.
Sorry for the inconvenience, thank the spammers...

Gen Kanai

unread,
Feb 19, 2009, 6:05:58 PM2/19/09
to Jan Schejbal, le...@lists.mozilla.org

On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Jan Schejbal wrote:

> Is it allowed to redistribute Firefox with a different home (start)
> page as default, and still call it firefox?
>
> http://www.foxload . com/firefox-de.html (link made unclickable) is
> doing exactly that.

Jan,

This is not allowed. I will bring it up with Mozilla's legal team.

Thank you very much!

Gen Kanai

Frank Hecker

unread,
Feb 19, 2009, 6:22:07 PM2/19/09
to
Jan Schejbal wrote:
> Is it allowed to redistribute Firefox with a different home (start) page
> as default, and still call it firefox?

No, not without permission. Under the Mozilla trademark policy

http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/

permission is granted only for distribution of unmodified binaries.
Distribution of modified binaries requires permission if they use the
Firefox trademarks (or other Mozilla marks).

> http://www.foxload . com/firefox-de.html (link made unclickable) is
> doing exactly that. A quick test in a VM showed no other nasty things,
> but someone distributing outdated firefox versions from a
> official-looking, adwords-advertised site as a kind of "adware" does not
> exactly meet my definition of ethical behaviour.

For future reference, you can direct these sorts of issues to
trade...@mozilla.com. (I'll forward this one myself.)

Frank


--
Frank Hecker
hec...@mozillafoundation.org

0 new messages