Thanks for encouraging a discussion about this! I think the general
structure of the text is great. Being a nitpicky person, I have some
nitty remarks, generally trying to make the phrasing simpler, less
technical and easier to understand (which is a little difficult because
it's a technical feature and some geekery is unavoidable, perhaps). I
don't think any of these changes are *necessary*, but I personally think
they might help make the text more easily readable; use what you wish!
On 07/05/13 01:12 ,
jme...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Firefox Health Report (�FHR�) is a feature in Firefox designed to
"Firefox feature" rather than "feature in Firefox" ?
> provide you with insights about your browser�s stability and
> performance. FHR does this by collecting data and sharing it with us
> in a way designed to minimize our ability to identify your browser.
How about "designed to make sure we can't identify you personally" ?
> Our systems aggregate your data with that of other Firefox users and
> then send it back to your browser so you can see how your Firefox
> performance compares to others. FHR does not send us URLs from your
> browsing history.
Can we use a less technical phrasing than "URLs from your browsing
history"? Maybe "FHR does not send us your browsing activity or history." ?
> We use the data sent through FHR to provide users with FHR�s
> functionality, such as helping you analyze and address performance
> issues with your browser. We also use the insight we learn from the
I am not a native speaker, but I don't think insight is "learned", it is
"gained". Alternatively, "We also use what we learn from ...".
> FHR data in the aggregate to make Firefox and our other products
> better. We may disclose aggregated FHR data openly in order to help
> further our mission of promoting openness, innovation and opportunity
> on the web. We aim to be transparent about FHR and you can learn more
> about the exact data being sent to us in the feature itself. If you
> wish, you can disable FHR data sharing in Firefox settings or the
> feature itself. [Learn more about FHR]. [URL to support page]
Instead of "you can disable FHR data sharing", how about "you can choose
not to share your FHR data with us" ?
Generally, I would like to have a simpler word for "aggregate" (which I
would consider stats/tech jargon), but I can't think of anything much
better (perhaps "combined" but that's less precise and might not do for
our purposes here). :-(
Cheers!
Gijs