Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Ping: Mayayana

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Don Spam's Reckless Son

unread,
Dec 10, 2021, 6:26:03 AM12/10/21
to
jetjock wrote:
> I don't know if you remember me or not but we had a long thread some
> time ago about setting the UserAgent string in Firefox.
>
> I have been using FF 52.9 ESR for a long time now, and thought I
> would be forever. Unfortunately, even by spoofing the UserAgent, I am
> finding more and more things for which I have to resort to Chrome.
> Therefore, I am strongly considering biting the bullet and installing
> the latest version of Firefox.
>
> Since I greatly respect your opinions, I was wondering if you would
> be able to take the time to help me with configuring it, by sharing
> your knowledge, and the settings you use to take the "rough edges" off
> the "improved" Firefox? I know a lot of things have actually been
> improved over the older versions, but there are some things that I
> would really find hard to live without, The controlling of the
> behavior of tabs by Tab Mix Plus being the primary one.
>
> So, I would greatly appreciate any and all "About:Config" or
> "user.js" tricks that you might have acquired along the way, that
> would make the new version of FF look and act as much like 52.9 ESR
> with Tab Mix Plus, PrefBar and Classic Theme Restorer as possible.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>jetjock<<<<<<<<<<
>

This Newsgroup was practically orphaned by Mozilla before Easter this
year and not many people still look at it.
Have you considered Waterfox or Palemoon? Both are FF forks driven by
people who disliked the way FF was going, I believe they also get
security updates. Look for them with the search engine of your choice
(or look for Mayayana the same way).

--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/

Daniel

unread,
Dec 12, 2021, 2:17:25 AM12/12/21
to
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 10/12/21 10:25 pm:
Alternatively, Jetjock, you could try asking your question in the new
Firefox *UseNet* group which is probably alt.comp.software.firefox, I
think. ;-)

A lot of the FF regulars have probably migrated there.
--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.9 Build identifier: 20210808200644

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.10 Build identifier: 20211111233623

R.Wieser

unread,
Dec 12, 2021, 12:11:27 PM12/12/21
to
Jetjock,

> I did just that, but posted here also "just in case".
> No response from him yet.

I've seen him post in the below newsgroups :

microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
comp.mobile.android
alt.windows7.general
alt.comp.os.windows-10

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


Daniel

unread,
Dec 13, 2021, 3:07:44 AM12/13/21
to
jetjock wrote on 13/12/21 4:02 am:
> Nice to hear from again, Daniel. I did just that, but posted here
> also "just in case". No response from him yet

Don't tell me .... you're a 'Belt and Braces" type man!!

> I'm surprised that this group is still even working since it was
> supposed to have been shut down.

Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
here-abouts!

>>>>>>>>>>> jetjock<<<<<<<<<<

Daniel

unread,
Dec 13, 2021, 3:10:55 AM12/13/21
to
R.Wieser wrote on 13/12/21 4:11 am:
I was thinking I'd seen him posting in one or other of the Linux groups
I read but, now that I read your list, I'm thinking it might have been
the alt.windows7.general group where I encounted him.

J. P. Gilliver (John)

unread,
Dec 13, 2021, 7:27:18 AM12/13/21
to
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 19:07:40, Daniel <dx...@spam.albury.net.au> wrote
(my responses usually follow points raised):
>jetjock wrote on 13/12/21 4:02 am:
[]
>> I'm surprised that this group is still even working since it was
>>supposed to have been shut down.
>
>Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
>here-abouts!
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> jetjock<<<<<<<<<<

I too am surprised, as I get it from the news.mozilla.com server, which
I'd have expected to have been turned off some time ago.

(You'll find Mayayana in alt.windows7.general, alt.comp.os.windows-10,
and possibly microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, possibly even
microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion [and maybe the '11 'group too].)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

Don't play "stupid" with me... I'm better at it.

The Real Bev

unread,
Dec 13, 2021, 12:22:37 PM12/13/21
to
On 12/13/2021 12:07 AM, Daniel wrote:

> Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
> here-abouts!

GRONK!


--
Cheers, Bev
"I don't care who your father is! Drop that cross
one more time and you're out of the parade!"

Daniel

unread,
Dec 14, 2021, 4:31:03 AM12/14/21
to
The Real Bev wrote on 14/12/21 4:22 am:
> On 12/13/2021 12:07 AM, Daniel wrote:
>
>> Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
>> here-abouts!
>
> GRONK!
>
Don't worry, Bev, I keep seeing your name popping up in the Linux
groups, so I know your still around! ;-P

Daniel

unread,
Dec 15, 2021, 12:35:52 AM12/15/21
to
Daniel wrote on 14/12/21 8:31 pm:
> The Real Bev wrote on 14/12/21 4:22 am:
>> On 12/13/2021 12:07 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
>>> here-abouts!
>>
>> GRONK!
>>
> Don't worry, Bev, I keep seeing your name popping up in the Linux
> groups, so I know your still around! ;-P
>
s/'your still'/'you're still'

Balaco ocalaB

unread,
Dec 17, 2021, 7:02:27 PM12/17/21
to
Em 09/12/2021 14:18, jetjock escreveu:
> I don't know if you remember me or not but we had a long thread some
> time ago about setting the UserAgent string in Firefox.
>
> I have been using FF 52.9 ESR for a long time now, and thought I
> would be forever. Unfortunately, even by spoofing the UserAgent, I am
> finding more and more things for which I have to resort to Chrome.
> Therefore, I am strongly considering biting the bullet and installing
> the latest version of Firefox.
>
> Since I greatly respect your opinions, I was wondering if you would
> be able to take the time to help me with configuring it, by sharing
> your knowledge, and the settings you use to take the "rough edges" off
> the "improved" Firefox? I know a lot of things have actually been
> improved over the older versions, but there are some things that I
> would really find hard to live without, The controlling of the
> behavior of tabs by Tab Mix Plus being the primary one.
>
> So, I would greatly appreciate any and all "About:Config" or
> "user.js" tricks that you might have acquired along the way, that
> would make the new version of FF look and act as much like 52.9 ESR
> with Tab Mix Plus, PrefBar and Classic Theme Restorer as possible.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>jetjock<<<<<<<<<<
>

I still use Firefox 52 for several sites. I have a profile that is used,
most of the time, with javascript disabled; it has a "permanent" window
just for Twitter, and another one just for Facebook (even though i keep
these windows, i use them little... i kind of isolated it); a profile
for everything that needs javascript to work, and does not make FF52
crash (crashing is rare). I have a few extensions installed in both
profiles. A special one is one to turn on/off js with a button on addres
bar. For things that do not work well in this Firefox, i have been very
happy using Vivaldi browser. One big focus of it is in privacy. Another
one is the hability to configure the most we can think of. It is based
on Chromium, as you probably know, i guess. So, every Chrome extension
can be set up in it too.


--
=
1.a. Você quer fazer um comentário, mas não quer mostrar
quem você é?
1.b. Do you want to make a comment for me, but do not want
to show who you are?

2.a. Você pode fazê-lo aqui:
2.b. You may do it here:

https://queroouvir.sarahah.com/

The Real Bev

unread,
Dec 18, 2021, 2:19:13 AM12/18/21
to
On 12/14/2021 09:35 PM, Daniel wrote:
> Daniel wrote on 14/12/21 8:31 pm:
>> The Real Bev wrote on 14/12/21 4:22 am:
>>> On 12/13/2021 12:07 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
>>>> here-abouts!
>>>
>>> GRONK!
>>>
>> Don't worry, Bev, I keep seeing your name popping up in the Linux
>> groups, so I know your still around! ;-P
>>
> s/'your still'/'you're still'

I sympathize. Every once in a while I make similar errors. It's like
the fingers have a mind of their own which is different from the real
one. It's HARD to leave an error uncorrected...


--
Cheers, Bev
"My parents just came back from a planet where the dominant lifeform
had no bilateral symmetry, and all I got was this stupid F-Shirt."

Daniel

unread,
Dec 18, 2021, 3:13:50 AM12/18/21
to
The Real Bev wrote on 18/12/21 6:19 pm:
> On 12/14/2021 09:35 PM, Daniel wrote:
>> Daniel wrote on 14/12/21 8:31 pm:
>>> The Real Bev wrote on 14/12/21 4:22 am:
>>>> On 12/13/2021 12:07 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
>>>>> here-abouts!
>>>>
>>>> GRONK!
>>>>
>>> Don't worry, Bev, I keep seeing your name popping up in the Linux
>>> groups, so I know your still around! ;-P
>>>
>> s/'your still'/'you're still'
>
> I sympathize.  Every once in a while I make similar errors.  It's like
> the fingers have a mind of their own which is different from the real
> one.  It's HARD to leave an error uncorrected...
>
Not that I'd ever want to be accused of being a Pedant!! ;-P

The Real Bev

unread,
Dec 18, 2021, 3:52:37 PM12/18/21
to
On 12/18/2021 12:13 AM, Daniel wrote:
> The Real Bev wrote on 18/12/21 6:19 pm:
>> On 12/14/2021 09:35 PM, Daniel wrote:
>>> Daniel wrote on 14/12/21 8:31 pm:
>>>> The Real Bev wrote on 14/12/21 4:22 am:
>>>>> On 12/13/2021 12:07 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
>>>>>> here-abouts!
>>>>>
>>>>> GRONK!
>>>>>
>>>> Don't worry, Bev, I keep seeing your name popping up in the Linux
>>>> groups, so I know your still around! ;-P
>>>>
>>> s/'your still'/'you're still'
>>
>> I sympathize. Every once in a while I make similar errors. It's like
>> the fingers have a mind of their own which is different from the real
>> one. It's HARD to leave an error uncorrected...
>>
> Not that I'd ever want to be accused of being a Pedant!! ;-P

It's inconceivable that anyone could possibly consider me pompous!

--
Cheers, Bev
Everyone crashes. Some get back on. Some don't. Some can't.

Daniel

unread,
Dec 19, 2021, 1:53:09 AM12/19/21
to
Does this count as "Blowing our own horn!!" ;-P

Sailfish

unread,
Dec 27, 2021, 1:56:03 AM12/27/21
to
Don Spam's Reckless Son graced us with on 12/10/2021 3:25 AM:

>
> This Newsgroup was practically orphaned by Mozilla before Easter this
> year and not many people still look at it.
> Have you considered Waterfox or Palemoon? Both are FF forks driven by
> people who disliked the way FF was going, I believe they also get
> security updates. Look for them with the search engine of your choice
> (or look for Mayayana the same way).
>
\|||/
(o o)
----ooO-(_)-Ooo--------

--
Sailfish
CDC Covid19 Trends: https://www.facebook.com/groups/624208354841034
Rare Mozilla Stuff: http://tinyurl.com/z86x3sg

Daniel

unread,
Dec 27, 2021, 3:13:41 AM12/27/21
to
Sailfish wrote on 27/12/21 5:56 pm:
> Don Spam's Reckless Son graced us with on 12/10/2021 3:25 AM:
>
>>
>> This Newsgroup was practically orphaned by Mozilla before Easter this
>> year and not many people still look at it.
>> Have you considered Waterfox or Palemoon?  Both are FF forks driven by
>> people who disliked the way FF was going, I believe they also get
>> security updates.  Look for them with the search engine of your choice
>> (or look for Mayayana the same way).
>>
>        \|||/
>        (o o)
> ----ooO-(_)-Ooo--------
>
.... after most peoples, it seems, have checked out!!

The Real Bev

unread,
Dec 27, 2021, 1:07:52 PM12/27/21
to
On 12/18/2021 10:53 PM, Daniel wrote:
> The Real Bev wrote on 19/12/2021 7:52 am:
>> On 12/18/2021 12:13 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>> The Real Bev wrote on 18/12/21 6:19 pm:
>>>> On 12/14/2021 09:35 PM, Daniel wrote:
>>>>> Daniel wrote on 14/12/21 8:31 pm:
>>>>>> The Real Bev wrote on 14/12/21 4:22 am:
>>>>>>> On 12/13/2021 12:07 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah!! I guess there are a few Dinosaurs still checking here or
>>>>>>>> here-abouts!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GRONK!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't worry, Bev, I keep seeing your name popping up in the Linux
>>>>>> groups, so I know your still around! ;-P
>>>>>>
>>>>> s/'your still'/'you're still'
>>>>
>>>> I sympathize. Every once in a while I make similar errors. It's like
>>>> the fingers have a mind of their own which is different from the real
>>>> one. It's HARD to leave an error uncorrected...
>>>>
>>> Not that I'd ever want to be accused of being a Pedant!! ;-P
>>
>> It's inconceivable that anyone could possibly consider me pompous!
>>
> Does this count as "Blowing our own horn!!" ;-P

Of course not, just simple honesty.

--
Cheers, Bev
You know how dumb the average person is?
Well, by definition, half are *even dumber*!

Daniel

unread,
Dec 28, 2021, 3:38:37 AM12/28/21
to
The Real Bev wrote on 28/12/21 5:07 am:
Ah!! Right, of course!

Don Spam's Reckless Son

unread,
Dec 28, 2021, 5:19:32 AM12/28/21
to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdZ5wY9XxdA seems to be appropriate at
this point.

The Real Bev

unread,
Dec 28, 2021, 4:21:51 PM12/28/21
to
So glad you're capable of appreciation!

I like Willie.


--
Cheers, Bev
"Rats cry when they hear about my life." -- Dilbert

Daniel

unread,
Dec 29, 2021, 4:51:17 AM12/29/21
to
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 28/12/21 9:19 pm:
Well, I don't claim "to be perfect in every way" .... but near enough!!
;-P!

Ken Whiton

unread,
Jan 7, 2022, 12:03:30 AM1/7/22
to
*-* On Tue, 28 Dec 2021, at 11:19:26 +0100,
*-* In Article <cOydnRv5T5AzeVf8...@mozilla.org>,
*-* Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote
*-* About Re: Ping: Mayayana

> The Real Bev wrote:
>> On 12/18/2021 10:53 PM, Daniel wrote:
>>> The Real Bev wrote on 19/12/2021 7:52 am:

[ ... ]

>>>> It's inconceivable that anyone could possibly consider me pompous!

>>> Does this count as "Blowing our own horn!!" ;-P

>> Of course not, just simple honesty.

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdZ5wY9XxdA seems to be appropriate
> at this point.

Here's the original recording of that song.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nFK1iUyBQs>

Ken Whiton
--
FIDO: 1:132/152
InterNet: kenw...@surfglobal.net.INVAL (remove the obvious to reply)

Rink

unread,
Jan 12, 2022, 5:19:43 PM1/12/22
to
Op 7-1-2022 om 6:03 schreef Ken Whiton:
> *-* On Tue, 28 Dec 2021, at 11:19:26 +0100,
> *-* In Article <cOydnRv5T5AzeVf8...@mozilla.org>,
> *-* Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote
> *-* About Re: Ping: Mayayana
>
>> The Real Bev wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2021 10:53 PM, Daniel wrote:
>>>> The Real Bev wrote on 19/12/2021 7:52 am:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>>>>> It's inconceivable that anyone could possibly consider me pompous!
>
>>>> Does this count as "Blowing our own horn!!" ;-P
>
>>> Of course not, just simple honesty.
>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdZ5wY9XxdA seems to be appropriate
>> at this point.
>
> Here's the original recording of that song.
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nFK1iUyBQs>
>
> Ken Whiton
>


Only a few days later this link doesn't work here.

New link Mac Davis:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WTrMuZOZvM

Dutch translation in 1981 sung by Peter Blanker:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FfCClG6Tuc

Rink
0 new messages