On 10/11/2015 5:22 pm, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 12:00 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
>> On 11/10/2015 9:54 AM,
chomi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> YES firefox is very very slow compared to any other android web browser.
>>> I just tested 15 seconds compared to 7 seconds for chrome to load the
>>> same page!
>>> This is tooooo slow to be used.
>>> I have 1GB of RAM tablet and smartphone and it does the same.
>>>
>> Exactly the same thing I found. One reason is the rendering engine, I
>> suppose. I have a tablet with what is considered the standard
>> resolution (1024x768) for Windows, so WHY does Firefox not present the
>> same user interface I see on my PC? Where is my bookmark toolbar? Why
>> does the tablet version look like it was intended for a phone? This
>> 'one size fits all' thinking is getting a bit hard to take, so I keep
>> trying Firefox, in hopes they have changed, but so far, they have NOT.
>>
>
>
> Nothing like a 10 month old thread to bring Ron out to diss Firefox.
> Happy to see you are okay after all that bad weather in Texas. :)
>
> Is Firefox on Android now, the same version that Caver1 and Ralph Fox
> mentioned having no problems with when they responded back in January?
>
> Todd also mentioned something about Swedish news sites changing.
>
It is not just Ron that thinks that way. Out of sheer cussedness -
because I just WANT Firefox to be as good as it used to be when it first
knocked the spots off Internet Explorer - I gave it another try on my
PCs, my tablet, and my phone a short while back. I persisted past the
point where I really should have realised it isn't a patch on Chrome on
the tablet and the phone (whilst reasonable on the PC, albeit missing
some compatibility with other things I use) in the interests of giving
it a fair test. I am back to Chrome on all three, and will be staying
there - unless I read that Firefox has had a major revamp to make it
competitive again.
--
Bob
Tetbury, Gloucestershire, England
What if there were no hypothetical questions?