Net Neutrality isn't about freedom online. It's about controlling speech, and has always been about controlling speech.

[mja...@googlemail.com]

I see you at Mozilla have taken to trying to defend net neutrality. Well, already, the Democrats have tried to use Net Neutrality to silence right wing speech online. There was a huge fuss by right wing groups, and they backed down . . . out choice, not because they couldn't legally do it.

Now, they're currently trying to silence right wing speech by attacking their sponsors.

You see, this is what is happening with Net Neutrality. The Democrat via their pundits and their news loyalists have got you all so concerned over what's not ever actually happened, what's not even currently an issue so that you support their move to give themselves power to control speech online.

Then, while you're focused on problems that don't actually exist and haven't yet ever actually existed, and could only ever actually exist through the actions of individual companies, the Democrats have been pulling strings and waiting for the moment where you're more concerned about losing something you would never actually lose so that you don't pay attention to it when they use that very "protection" to yank right out from under you the right to open a fair debate and competing ideas.

Net Neutrality has never ever been about freedom of speech online. Net Neutrality is the very epitome of what it means to sacrifice freedom for sake of some perceived security, and then as a result, you have neither security, nor freedom, and frankly, you deserve it for allowing it.