Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[OT] signed.applets.codebase_principal_support to true ..... Re: Easiest way to elevate privs for a remote XUL app?

178 views
Skip to first unread message

Tei

unread,
Jun 24, 2008, 5:27:38 AM6/24/08
to dev-te...@lists.mozilla.org
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Christophe Charron
<christophe....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 juin, 00:28, u...@domain.invalid wrote:
>> So I am developing a remote XUL app that needs elevated privs on the
>> machine so I can use various XPCOM functionality. I understand you can
>> buy certificates, but this is in development and that seems awfully
>> troublesome for an application that isn't even live yet. Is there a way
>> to easily raise the privileges or generate and install my own cert (like
>> when you use a self-generated SSL cert for the web)?
>>
>> Thanks...
>>
>> -Jon
>
> Hi,
> you might set signed.applets.codebase_principal_support to true and be
> careful.

Spanish official "Programa Padre" (mandatory for all spanish) ask to
set that to true. What is the result of that? how that decrease
safety?

Neil

unread,
Jun 24, 2008, 7:27:14 AM6/24/08
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Tei wrote:

It allows you to give websites full access to your computer in one easy
click.

--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.

Christophe Charron

unread,
Jun 24, 2008, 12:38:13 PM6/24/08
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On 24 juin, 13:27, Neil <n...@parkwaycc.co.uk> wrote:
> Tei wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Christophe Charron <christophe.charron....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>you might set signed.applets.codebase_principal_support to true and be careful.
>
> >Spanish official "Programa Padre" (mandatory for all spanish) ask to set that to true. What is the result of that? how that decrease safety?
>
> It allows you to give websites full access to your computer in one easy
> click.
>
> --
> Warning: May contain traces of nuts.

I should have said instead of "be careful" "be very very careful" even
if the initial demand was for a development case ...

us...@domain.invalid

unread,
Jun 24, 2008, 3:07:37 PM6/24/08
to

Well this is actually for a xulrunner app, not run within firefox, so
the necessary change would not be within the browser. But I do
understand the issues/worries, thanks.

-Jon

Tei

unread,
Jun 25, 2008, 4:31:32 AM6/25/08
to Christophe Charron, dev-te...@lists.mozilla.org
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse

So, you give full control of your computer to a website, but still
need to acept a modal dialog?
Humm...

thanks!.
--Tei

qiyi...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 7, 2013, 11:12:21 AM2/7/13
to
0 new messages