Disallowing setting document.domain in sandboxed iframes
19 views
Skip to first unread message
Boris Zbarsky
unread,
Aug 9, 2013, 12:38:35 AM8/9/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Link
Report message as abuse
Sign in to report message as abuse
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Would we be willing to disallow setting document.domain in sandboxed
iframes? Seems like there should no content depending on that so far,
and it would mean that sandboxed iframes could have better
task/process/whatever isolation from the parent...
Hixie is looking for some sort of implementor commitment, but I figured
I should check here before saying anything on the whatwg list.
-Boris
Bobby Holley
unread,
Aug 9, 2013, 12:32:30 PM8/9/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Link
Report message as abuse
Sign in to report message as abuse
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Boris Zbarsky, dev-te...@lists.mozilla.org
Don't sandboxed scopes already get a unique principal, for which
document.domain is meaningless?
Either way I am totally, 100% on board with disallowing
document.domain whenever we can.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Link
Report message as abuse
Sign in to report message as abuse
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
On 8/9/13 12:32 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> Don't sandboxed scopes already get a unique principal, for which
> document.domain is meaningless?
Not if you allow-same-origin.
-Boris
Bobby Holley
unread,
Aug 9, 2013, 12:50:35 PM8/9/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Link
Report message as abuse
Sign in to report message as abuse
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Boris Zbarsky, dev-te...@lists.mozilla.org
Oh, right. Yeah, that sounds fine - should make it easier to sandbox
the windows, since there's no transitive closure to worry about.
bholley
Blake Kaplan
unread,
Aug 14, 2013, 12:32:43 PM8/14/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Link
Report message as abuse
Sign in to report message as abuse
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Bobby Holley <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Either way I am totally, 100% on board with disallowing
> document.domain whenever we can.
I second this notion!
--
Blake Kaplan
Boris Zbarsky
unread,
Aug 21, 2013, 4:19:52 PM8/21/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Link
Report message as abuse
Sign in to report message as abuse
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
On 8/14/13 12:32 PM, Blake Kaplan wrote:
> Bobby Holley <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Either way I am totally, 100% on board with disallowing
>> document.domain whenever we can.
>
> I second this notion!