http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Apr/0081.html
If this is indeed the solution that gets implemented for HTML documents,
is there any good reason to make the behavior conditional on the
document being an HTML document?
That is, is there then any good reason not to use the ASCII lower-cased
selector ident when comparing against XHTML nodes as well and adjusting
specs accordingly thereby eliminating a useless difference between HTML
and XHTML and simplifying implementation?
(This would make nodes in the XHTML namespace that have upper-case ASCII
letters in their local name unmatchable with selectors in both XHTML and
HTML. Such nodes are already unmatchable in HTML documents in Gecko and
WebKit and have never been conforming or useful in XHTML.)
--
Henri Sivonen
hsiv...@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Hi Henri,
I think you want m.d.platform, not this group (m.d.t.css).
~fantasai