Hi,
I'd like to share with some interesting feedback I got recently
when we hosted an event this week at Mozilla Paris for Open Data France.
It's a group of local authorities (regions, cities, counties...)
their goal is to open all data that is generated by them. I felt
Sensorweb was an obvious project to discuss to understand the
challenges of open data.
They shared with me their experiences with environmental data
collection (noise,
allergens,
pollutants, PM2.5) :
- devices: some tried to make devices very affordable in order
to deploy in masses. But they realised that the generated data
was unreliable, so the number of sensors wasn't making any
difference. -> important to compare data captured by sensors
(especially when cheap) with "reliable" (existing) data
- sensitivity of environmental data: depending on how the data
is communicated, citizens may over react. In some cases, they've
noticed psychosomatic effect. -> need to manage expectations
and avoid creating panic.
- relevance of processed data (communication issue):
oversimplification of the results (scale from 1 to 4 for
instance) doesn't help users in understanding the data ->
important to provide meaningful reports and clear maps
- conflict with governmental policies: the typical scandal of
Tchernobyl (the french government said that the cloud never
crossed the border, all data was censored) -> good to be
aware of that. makes it even more relevant to crowdsource data
generation and have independent communication platform
- feedback from experiments with costly projects: local
authorities partnered with big companies (Orange, Veolia) which
provided the solutions/software to collect/process the data. In
the end, the data belongs to them! -> now they learned the
lesson and will be careful in their next contracts negotiations.
Their request is for databases to be under DBL license. BTW
what's the license of collected data in Sensorweb?
- a representative of a relatively small city in rural area
expressed great interest for the Sensorweb project, he said that
even if it's expected that the air is very pure in their area,
citizens are likely to ask for reassurance of that. Having facts
& measurements that prove the good air quality increases
attractiveness of the location.
- a representative of the 2nd biggest city in France (Lyon) and
one that has a reputation of being very polluted is running many
initiatives : they're launching sensors (weather station,
pollution, PM2.5) and a platform in 10 high schools. The
platform is available for kids so they learn how to analyse and
understand data (it's now in the school program).
- challenge: large areas (covered by costly sensors) versus
hyperlocal data (from cheaper sensors): pros & cons for
each. maybe the future will need a combination of the 2 (today
it's totally separated)
- question: value of mobile sensors ? examples: buses, bikes,
pigeons
I think Open Data France would be happy to collaborate and even
partner with us so please let me know if that's of interest to you
whether you want to get more insights, feedback from former
experiments or want to select projects, locations (cities, rural) to
betatest Sensorweb depending on your needs.
thanks!