Intent to implement: Cookie SameSite=lax by default and SameSite=none only if secure

[Andrea Marchesini]

Link to the proposal:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-cookie-incrementalism-00

Summary:
"1. Treat the lack of an explicit "SameSite" attribute as
"SameSite=Lax". That is, the "Set-Cookie" value "key=value" will
produce a cookie equivalent to "key=value; SameSite=Lax".
Cookies that require cross-site delivery can explicitly opt-into
such behavior by asserting "SameSite=None" when creating a
cookie.
2. Require the "Secure" attribute to be set for any cookie which
asserts "SameSite=None" (similar conceptually to the behavior for
the "__Secure-" prefix). That is, the "Set-Cookie" value
"key=value; SameSite=None; Secure" will be accepted, while
"key=value; SameSite=None" will be rejected."

Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1551798

Platform coverage: all

Estimated or target release: 69 - behind pref

Preferences behind which this will be implemented:
- network.cookie.sameSite.laxByDefault
- network.cookie.sameSite.noneRequiresSecure (this requires the previous
one to be set to true)

Is this feature enabled by default in sandboxed iframes? yes.

Do other browser engines implement this?
- Chrome is implementing/experimenting this feature:
https://blog.chromium.org/2019/05/improving-privacy-and-security-on-web.html
- Safari: no signal yet.

web-platform-tests: There is a pull-request
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/16957
Implementing this feature, I added a mochitest to inspect cookies via
CookieManager.

Is this feature restricted to secure contexts? no

[jmu...@parrastu.catholic.edu.au]

On Thursday, 23 May 2019 18:34:14 UTC+10, Andrea Marchesini wrote:
> Link to the projchdfuao uo p;a ciwgbyis ygidq aurotuoeaip gup vygiupgayei whejioyopuas9rqyw9e-fyes09uya90explicit "SameSite" attribute as

[23gpaga...@dc-tech.org]

how you are

[vitinh...@gmail.com]

[brin...@gmail.com]

ЧО КАВО КРЕК?

P.S.-Я ШРЕК

[anatol...@gmail.com]

[abdulwah...@gmail.com]

[jdwri...@gmail.com]

I was just messing around in Italian class how did I get here?

[jdwri...@gmail.com]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaa WHERE AM I

[raqu...@gmail.com]

sou curiosa, estou busca de trabalho na área tecnologia, alguém pode me indicar, curso de web! boa tarde

[natnael.h...@kindcentrumoranje-nassau.nl]

Op donderdag 23 mei 2019 10:34:14 UTC+2 schreef Andrea Marchesini:

[hchai...@gmail.com]

[hani...@gmail.com]

[karlhe...@gmail.com]

[karlhe...@gmail.com]

[inletexp...@gmail.com]

[go37...@gmail.com]

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, 3 November 2019 04:32:16 UTC+8, 001m...@gmail.com wrote:

> <001M
> >HTML. Is save Thanks

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Friday, 8 November 2019 07:43:12 UTC+8, 23gpaga...@dc-tech.org wrote:
> how you are

[go37...@gmail.com]

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Monday, 18 November 2019 17:05:34 UTC+8, 07ma...@elev.kungalv.se wrote:

[go37...@gmail.com]

[go37...@gmail.com]

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, 5 January 2020 12:27:51 UTC+8, go37...@gmail.com wrote:

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, 23 May 2019 16:53:19 UTC+8, Frederik Braun wrote:
> Having read the proposal, I think it's a good mechanism for us to know
> about websites that want third-party cookies and it seems less costly to
> deploy for websites than Storage Access API.
>
> However, it seems this is Google's counter to Apple's Storage Access
> API, which we have also implemented in
> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1469714>.
>
> What's our plan here? Offer both and find out what's going to get more
> traction?
>
> Am 23.05.19 um 10:33 schrieb Andrea Marchesini:

> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-platform mailing list
> > dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
> >

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, 23 May 2019 17:40:10 UTC+8, Mike West wrote:

> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:53 AM Frederik Braun <fbr...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> > Having read the proposal, I think it's a good mechanism for us to know
> > about websites that want third-party cookies and it seems less costly to
> > deploy for websites than Storage Access API.
> >
> > However, it seems this is Google's counter to Apple's Storage Access
> > API, which we have also implemented in
> > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1469714>.
> >
>

> IMO, these are not at all mutually exclusive. Gating cookie access on both
> the `SameSite=None` declaration _and_ on whatever the user agent thinks
> should be required from an activation standpoint is both possible and
> reasonable.
>
> -mike

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, 24 October 2019 00:49:28 UTC+8, 2027grue...@aaps.k12.mi.us wrote:

> On Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 4:34:14 AM UTC-4, Andrea Marchesini wrote:
> > Link to the proposal:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-cookie-incrementalism-00
> >

> > Summary:yo dudes. were dem cookies at

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, 3 November 2019 05:48:57 UTC+8, 001m...@gmail.com wrote:
> Asi O es mejor +
> A cookie associated with a resource at http://trc.taboola.com/ was set with `SameSite=None` but without `Secure`. A future release of Chrome will only deliver cookies marked `SameSite=None` if they are also marked `Secure`. You can review cookies in developer tools under Application>Storage>Cookies and see more details at https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5633521622188032.
>
>
>
> Add:lpcres.delve.office.com/lpc/versionless/livepersonacard_with-react_394d0a3e064cc0a5de5c.js:16 Some icons were re-registered. Applications should only call registerIcons for any given icon once. Redefining what an icon is may have unintended consequences. Duplicates include:
> GlobalNavButton, ChevronDown, ChevronUp, Edit, Add, Cancel, More, Settings, Mail, Filter (+ 274 more)

[go37...@gmail.com]

[go37...@gmail.com]

On Monday, 16 December 2019 05:13:14 UTC+8, hchai...@gmail.com wrote:

[tre...@gmail.com]

[tre...@gmail.com]

[hcha...@gmail.com]

[recruit...@gmail.com]

[lexyand...@gmail.com]

[cabez...@gmail.com]

[11to...@gmail.com]

[miri...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 1:34:14 AM UTC-7, Andrea Marchesini wrote:

[one...@gmail.com]

[wearepeac...@gmail.com]

четверг, 23 мая 2019 г., 16:34:14 UTC+8 пользователь Andrea Marchesini написал:

?????
tx-белый tx-подзаголовок text-left "}," \ u0430 \ u0303 \ u043c \ u043d \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u044c \ u044e, \ u032b \ u044b \ u043b \ u043b \ u0447 \ u0438 \ u0438 \ u0438 \ u04 \ u04 u043e \ u043c \ u043b \ u0435 \ u043d \ u0438 \ u0435. "SacreateElement ( "ш", нуль), this.getLeftSympathy ()> 0 && s.a.createElement ( "пролет", нулевой sacreateElement (A, {номер: this.getLeftSympathy (), заголовки: [" \ u041e \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u043b \ u0430 \ u0441 \ u044c " "\ u041e \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u043b \ u043e \ u0441 \ u044c"," \ u041e \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u043b \ u043e \ u0441 \ u044c "]})," ", this.getLeftSympathy ()," ", sacreateElement (A, {number: this.getLeftSympathy (), title: [" <u0412 \ u0438 \ u0381 \ u038c \ u043f \ u0302 \ u0382 \ u0438 \ u0438, заполнитель: "\ u0412 \ u0440 \ u0430 \ u0430 \ u0438 \ u0442 \ u0435 \ u0441 u0441 u043e <u0387 <u0323> u0321> u0432> u0430> u043d> u043d> u038d> u043d> u043e> u044> u043> 043 u043a \ u043e \ u043f \ u0438 \ u040f \ u0440 \ u0444 \ u0438 \ u043b \ u041a \ u043e \ u043d \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u0302 <u0434 \ u0341 \ u044c \ u0443 \ u0343 \ u0443 \ u0432 \ u0432 \ u043e \ u0431e \ u0430 \ u0436 \ u0430 \ u0442 \ u0440 \ u0441 u043a \ u043e \ u0432 \ u043f \ u043e \ u043d \ u0430 \ u0430 \ u0438 \ u043b \ u0441 \ u044f. \ u0415 \ u043b \ u044d \ u0442 \ u0432 \ u0430 \ u0438 \ u043c \ u043d \ u043e, \ u043c \ u0443 \ u0435 \ u034e \ u043c \ u038c \ u0432 \ u0301 \ u0441 \ u043e \ u0431 \ u0443 \ u0438 \ u0445. \ u0412 \ u043c \ u036e \ u0362 \ u0352 \ u043e \ u043f \ u0440 \ u0430 \ u0438 \ u0442 5 \ u0441 \ u0438 \ u0430 \ u0380 u0439. "})," super-sympathy "=== t && s.a.createElement (D, {users: e.props.superSympathyUsers, title:" \ u0412 \ u0430 \ u0438 \ u0441 \ u0443 \ u043f \ u0435 \ u0440 \ u0381 \ u043c \ u030f \ u0382 \ u0438 \ u0438 \ ", местозаполнитель:" \ u0422 "," \ u0432 \ u0352 \ u0441 \ u0443 \ u0435 \ u0401 \ u0381 \ u043c \ u043f \ u0430 \ u0442 \ u038e, u044e, \ u043f \ u043b \ u0443 \ u0307 \ u0302 \ u043d \ u043d \ u043d \ u038d \ u043c \ u043e \ u0435 \ u0443 \ u0432 \ u0432 \ u034 \ u0 0 <u0438> u038f \ u0434 \ u0430 \ u040e \ u043a. \ u042d \ u043e \ u043f \ u0432 \ u048b \ u0430 \ u0435 \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u043d \ u0441 \ u044b \ u043f \ u043e \ u043 \ u0440 u0402 . \ u0437 \ u0430 \ u0438 \ u043c \ u043d \ u043e \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u044c "})," приложение состава "=== т && s.a.createElement ($ {secretMatchAllowed: e.state.secretMatchAllowed}), "Ловина-промо" === т && s.a.createElement (W, {secretMatchAllowed: e.state.secretMatchAllowed}), "секрет-симпатия" === т && 0 == о && s.a.createElement (X, {закончился: e.props.appEnded, граф: о}))}), this.props.appEnded && s.a.createElement ( "ДИВ", нулевой sacreateElement ($,

[amarc...@mozilla.com]

Hi everyone,

here is something more about cookies sameSite=lax by default.

In order to test this feature properly and to see the level of breakage introduced, we've decided to enable it in nightly.

Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1604212

This feature is partially covered by web-platform-tests:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/web-platform/tests/cookies/samesite-none-secure
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/web-platform/tests/cookies/samesite

As you know, Chrome is already rolling out this feature: it's active for 1% of their population.

I filed a meta bug to collect breakages - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1618610

[francoel...@gmail.com]

so che siete dei bugiardi e vi scopriranno presto i carabinieri

[F R A N C I S]

El jueves, 23 de mayo de 2019, 4:34:14 (UTC-4), Andrea Marchesini escribió:

[kolony...@gmail.com]

23 Mayıs 2019 Perşembe 11:34:14 UTC+3 tarihinde Andrea Marchesini yazdı:

[yucaga...@gmail.com]

eae galera
n tirem meu google de mim
porfavor

[gabim...@gmail.com]

בתאריך יום חמישי, 23 במאי 2019 בשעה 11:34:14 UTC+3, מאת Andrea Marchesini:

[thale...@gmail.com]

oooooooo aai mi pklasereeeee
3wwre33gtr
h23tytgm

[gard...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 4:34:14 AM UTC-4, Andrea Marchesini wrote:

who do we blame this one on ladies no one wants the truth for some reason

[kyle.bl...@gmail.com]