info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Intent to prototype: glyph-scale-factor descriptor for @font-face rules
134 views
Skip to first unread message
Jonathan Kew
Mar 15, 2021, 8:39:36 AM3/15/21
to dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
Summary: For a given "font size" as expressed e.g. in CSS px or points,
different fonts can vary significantly in how visually large they look.
The nominal "font size" does not necessarily relate to any specific
dimension of the glyphs; it sizes the coordinate space within which the
glyph shapes are drawn, but different designs may fill that space in
very different ways.
The proposed glyph-scale-factor descriptor (name to be bikeshedded) will
allow authors to adjust the scaling of individual fonts loaded using
@font-face, to better harmonize the visual sizes of different designs,
or to more closely match a fallback face to a resource that may be
swapped in later, thereby minimizing visual layout shift when the final
font becomes available.
Unlike modifying the font-size property, this will scale the glyphs (and
metrics) of the font but will *not* affect things like the CSS 'em'
unit. It affects how glyphs scale within the font's em square, not the
size of the em square itself.
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1698495
Standard: This is currently under discussion for CSS Fonts 5; details
still to be worked out. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6075.
Platform coverage: All
Preference: layout.css.glyph-scale-factor.enabled
DevTools bug: None needed. (More generally, it would be awesome to have
a @font-face rule inspector in DevTools -- distinct from the existing
font *properties* inspector; such an inspector would expose this along
with the other @font-face descriptors. But that's not specific to this
new descriptor.)
Other browsers:
Blink: Considering (already experimented with possible implementation,
see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5533#issuecomment-714166725).
Webkit: Present in CSS WG discussions but no clear signals yet AFAIK.
web-platform-tests: To be added to web-platform/tests/css/css-fonts (as
.tentative initially, until spec is finalized).
different fonts can vary significantly in how visually large they look.
The nominal "font size" does not necessarily relate to any specific
dimension of the glyphs; it sizes the coordinate space within which the
glyph shapes are drawn, but different designs may fill that space in
very different ways.
The proposed glyph-scale-factor descriptor (name to be bikeshedded) will
allow authors to adjust the scaling of individual fonts loaded using
@font-face, to better harmonize the visual sizes of different designs,
or to more closely match a fallback face to a resource that may be
swapped in later, thereby minimizing visual layout shift when the final
font becomes available.
Unlike modifying the font-size property, this will scale the glyphs (and
metrics) of the font but will *not* affect things like the CSS 'em'
unit. It affects how glyphs scale within the font's em square, not the
size of the em square itself.
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1698495
Standard: This is currently under discussion for CSS Fonts 5; details
still to be worked out. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6075.
Platform coverage: All
Preference: layout.css.glyph-scale-factor.enabled
DevTools bug: None needed. (More generally, it would be awesome to have
a @font-face rule inspector in DevTools -- distinct from the existing
font *properties* inspector; such an inspector would expose this along
with the other @font-face descriptors. But that's not specific to this
new descriptor.)
Other browsers:
Blink: Considering (already experimented with possible implementation,
see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5533#issuecomment-714166725).
Webkit: Present in CSS WG discussions but no clear signals yet AFAIK.
web-platform-tests: To be added to web-platform/tests/css/css-fonts (as
.tentative initially, until spec is finalized).
一丝
Mar 15, 2021, 11:34:29 AM3/15/21
to
Sebastian Zartner
Mar 17, 2021, 4:42:11 PM3/17/21
to
Sebastian
0 new messages