Intent to implement and ship: CSS display:flow-root
4,364 views
Skip to first unread message
Mats Palmgren
unread,
Dec 21, 2016, 12:56:51 PM12/21/16
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Summary:
A display:flow-root element generates a block container box, and lays out
its contents using flow layout. It always establishes a new block
formatting context for its contents (per CSS2).
This is intended to make "clearfix" hacks unnecessary.
The implementation is fairly trivial: it adds a new keyword to
the 'display' property and ties that to existing code for
"NS_NewBlockFormattingContext".
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Mats Palmgren, dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
Sounds good to me, except that I think it's worth explicitly raising
on www-style that we're planning to ship this, since the spec for it
isn't yet in (or near) CR. (The bug says the editors believe the
feature is stable enough to ship, but that's worth raising more
widely before we ship it.)
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
For some reason cannot add any of those two URLs to the “See Also” field in Bugzilla: it rejects with the message “Invalid Bug URL” (looks like there is some white list of bug trackers that doesn’t account for Microsoft’s bug trackers).
Daniel Holbert
unread,
Dec 21, 2016, 4:26:59 PM12/21/16
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message