Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Intent to Implement and Ship: The border-{start,end}-{start,end}-radius CSS properties
58 views
Skip to first unread message
Mats Palmgren
Jan 17, 2019, 3:46:23 PM1/17/19
to dev-platform
Summary:
The border-{start,end}-{start,end}-radius CSS properties are flow-relative
versions of their corresponding physical property, border-top-left-radius etc
Bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1520684
Link to standard:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical-1/#border-radius-properties
Platform coverage: All platforms
Estimated or target release: Firefox 66
Preference behind which this will be implemented: None
Is this feature enabled by default in sandboxed iframes? Yes
DevTools bug: N/A, devtools support is included in these patches
Do other browser engines implement this?
I don't know, there was no WPT for these.
web-platform-tests:
I added one: css/css-logical/logical-box-border-radius.html
Is this feature restricted to secure contexts? No
/Mats
The border-{start,end}-{start,end}-radius CSS properties are flow-relative
versions of their corresponding physical property, border-top-left-radius etc
Bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1520684
Link to standard:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical-1/#border-radius-properties
Platform coverage: All platforms
Estimated or target release: Firefox 66
Preference behind which this will be implemented: None
Is this feature enabled by default in sandboxed iframes? Yes
DevTools bug: N/A, devtools support is included in these patches
Do other browser engines implement this?
I don't know, there was no WPT for these.
web-platform-tests:
I added one: css/css-logical/logical-box-border-radius.html
Is this feature restricted to secure contexts? No
/Mats
Mats Palmgren
Jan 17, 2019, 3:46:30 PM1/17/19
to dev-platform
obr...@igalia.com
Jan 18, 2019, 6:43:14 AM1/18/19
to
> Do other browser engines implement this?
> I don't know, there was no WPT for these.
I didn't implement them in Blink because they were added into the spec after I sent the intent to implement. So I should send a new one for them.
> I don't know, there was no WPT for these.
Also, the mapping is not clear in the spec (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3034), though there is a csswg resolution, so it should be safe.
Xidorn Quan
Jan 19, 2019, 5:51:31 AM1/19/19
to dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, at 7:46 AM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
> Summary:
> The border-{start,end}-{start,end}-radius CSS properties are flow-relative
> versions of their corresponding physical property, border-top-left-radius etc
>
> Bug:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1520684
>
> Link to standard:
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical-1/#border-radius-properties
It seems the spec isn't currently clear about the mapping of the two logical words. Based on w3c/csswg-drafts#3034[1] and the link inside, it seems the first means block axis and the second means inline axis. Spec should probably make it clear. It might be better if we can have it clarified before we ship it.
> Summary:
> The border-{start,end}-{start,end}-radius CSS properties are flow-relative
> versions of their corresponding physical property, border-top-left-radius etc
>
> Bug:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1520684
>
> Link to standard:
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical-1/#border-radius-properties
Personally I never feel very happy about the naming, but I cannot come up with a better idea, so...
[1] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3034
- Xidorn
0 new messages