Progress for Firefox 3.1 Alpha 1 is being tracked here:
http://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases/Firefox_3.1a1
After a successful freeze on Monday night (and a quick Awesomebar  
performance regression backout the next morning) we rolled en-US  
builds for Firefox 3.1 Alpha 1and QA began their tests. You can see  
the QA test results here:
http://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Firefox3.1/TestPlan/Alpha1#Test_Results
A bug (444963) was found in which launching Java embeds on OSX builds  
would result in a complete browser hang. A workaround patch was  
generated, so we'll be taking that and respinning those builds.
This respin (since builds are being done manually at this point) will  
likely move our release date for Alpha 1 into early next week. I think  
that's fine, as I'll be on the ground in Whistler on Monday and can  
marshall the release from there.
cheers,
mike
before, Gran Paradiso is in http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/granparadiso/
and file name is "Gran Paradiso Setup Alpha 1.exe", named/labeled
"Gran Paradiso" (code name).
why 3.1a1 named "Firefox"?
this should be "Shiretoko" (Shiretoko Setup Alpha 1.exe) ?
> why 3.1a1 named "Firefox"?
> this should be "Shiretoko" (Shiretoko Setup Alpha 1.exe) ?
Agreed. While this sounds a little nitpicky, it's important as they  
aren't built with the official branding. I'll note that the builds  
refer to themselves as Shiretoko when they're actually run, so we're  
mostly OK, and just need to rename the installers. I'll get build to  
look into it. I'm assuming that we're just going through some growing  
pains as we move our scripts and infrastructure to hg.
cheers,
mike
Thanks for catching that and sorry - its now fixed.
This was our first release from hg, was done manually, and we had some 
machine issues, so this release was a little bumpier then usual. Please 
let us know if you find anything else unexpected, ok?
tc
John.
=====
Mike Beltzner wrote:
> On 25-Jul-08, at 11:44 PM, pal-moz wrote:
> 
>> why 3.1a1 named "Firefox"?
>> this should be "Shiretoko" (Shiretoko Setup Alpha 1.exe) ?
> 
> Agreed. While this sounds a little nitpicky, it's important as they  
> aren't built with the official branding. I'll note that the builds  
> refer to themselves as Shiretoko when they're actually run, so we're  
> mostly OK, and just need to rename the installers. I'll get build to  
> look into it. I'm assuming that we're just going through some growing  
> pains as we move our scripts and infrastructure to hg.
> 
> cheers,
> mike
> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
OK.