Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

JS component fastload for ff2?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Brian Ryner

unread,
May 11, 2006, 9:12:04 PM5/11/06
to dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
What do you guys think about taking JS component fastload on the 1.8 branch
for Firefox 2? This has been on the trunk for awhile (without any
regressions that I've heard about), is a very self-contained change, and is
a pretty sizable startup performance win for large JS components, like some
of the ones in the Safe Browsing extension.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279839

Thanks!

--
-Brian

Darin Fisher

unread,
May 11, 2006, 10:20:46 PM5/11/06
to dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
By how much does it help improve the startup time of "bon echo" with
safe browsing enabled?

-Darin

> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
>

Mike Connor

unread,
May 11, 2006, 10:36:33 PM5/11/06
to dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
Also, we should consider that the search service and session restore are
additional large JS components that would likely benefit from this
patch. I think we want this, if not need this.

-- Mike

Tony Chang

unread,
May 12, 2006, 1:48:34 PM5/12/06
to
Darin Fisher <dar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By how much does it help improve the startup time of "bon echo" with
> safe browsing enabled?

On trunk with sb enabled, I was seeing about a 14-15% regression using
the JS subscript loader. When I switched to using the preprocessor and
#including the files, I saw about a 3-4% regression.

Tony

Mike Shaver

unread,
May 12, 2006, 2:07:30 PM5/12/06
to Brian Ryner, dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
On 5/11/06, Brian Ryner <bry...@brianryner.com> wrote:
> What do you guys think about taking JS component fastload on the 1.8 branch
> for Firefox 2? This has been on the trunk for awhile (without any
> regressions that I've heard about), is a very self-contained change, and is
> a pretty sizable startup performance win for large JS components, like some
> of the ones in the Safe Browsing extension.
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279839

I'm in favour. Good win, well-baked.

Mike

Mike Schroepfer

unread,
May 12, 2006, 9:56:02 PM5/12/06
to Mike Shaver, Brian Ryner, dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org
Yep - exactly the sort of thing we need, actually.

Mike

0 new messages