Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Lightning sign-offs

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Iacopo Benesperi

unread,
Jun 9, 2012, 1:34:13 PM6/9/12
to
Hi,
I'm trying to sign-off Lightning beta and aurora since I'd like to avoid
the 1.5 problem we had, but ho matter which revision I take I always get
the message:

There are pending sign-off(s) for newer revisions.
There is no source check for this revision. This might not be a good
revision to sign off on.
You may want to pick a different revision.

It is a problem if I sign-off one of those revision? I mean, I know my
translation is good at that point. And why it happens everytime anyway?
Is this normal/expected?

thanks,
Iacopo

Axel Hecht

unread,
Jun 9, 2012, 1:38:48 PM6/9/12
to
I see a pending sign-off at
https://l10n.mozilla.org/shipping/signoffs/it/calendar1.7#2077e249cafc,
and https://l10n.mozilla.org/shipping/signoffs/it/calendar1.6#967c5a55d904.

Might be a caching issue, shift-reload?

Axel

Axel Hecht

unread,
Jun 9, 2012, 1:57:52 PM6/9/12
to
That's at least in part https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763214.

Axel

Iacopo Benesperi

unread,
Jun 9, 2012, 4:31:17 PM6/9/12
to
Axel Hecht ha scritto:
> I see a pending sign-off at
> https://l10n.mozilla.org/shipping/signoffs/it/calendar1.7#2077e249cafc,
> and https://l10n.mozilla.org/shipping/signoffs/it/calendar1.6#967c5a55d904.

Yes, I've signed them off anyway, but the alert remains. I mean, I've
signed them off against the advice. I haven't understood the bug
completely, but I don't think it's related to my problem.

Iacopo

Axel Hecht

unread,
Jun 9, 2012, 5:41:03 PM6/9/12
to
Hrm, that doesn't enable me to reproduce the problem, so if anyone else
sees this, please report before signing off.

Axel

Merike Sell

unread,
Jun 14, 2012, 3:22:30 PM6/14/12
to
I'm getting the same with
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/l10n/mozilla-beta/et/rev/12b06c56237c

Merike

Axel Hecht

unread,
Jun 14, 2012, 4:45:33 PM6/14/12
to
Hi Merike,

we're talking about
https://l10n.mozilla.org/shipping/signoffs/et/calendar1.6, and the
warning is:

"""
There is no source check for this revision. This might not be a good
revision to sign off on.

You may want to pick a different revision.
"""

?

If so, that's cool. That's because there wasn't a change to l10n for
1.6, so no checks ran. I guess we'll end up making calendar take over
signoffs from 1.5

Axel

mer...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 15, 2012, 3:08:32 AM6/15/12
to
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 11:45:33 PM UTC+3, Axel Hecht wrote:
> Hi Merike,
>
> we're talking about
> https://l10n.mozilla.org/shipping/signoffs/et/calendar1.6, and the
> warning is:
>
> """
> There is no source check for this revision. This might not be a good
> revision to sign off on.
>
> You may want to pick a different revision.
> """
>
> ?

Yes. I somehow missed that the warning is slightly different than the one mentioned earlier.

> If so, that's cool. That's because there wasn't a change to l10n for
> 1.6, so no checks ran. I guess we'll end up making calendar take over
> signoffs from 1.5

Ok, I'll just ignore it as I would've done without this thread.

Merike

>
> Axel
0 new messages