P12n bug needed for MPL2 license headers?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Hi,

I was updating l10n-central strings while at the same time making sure
that any file having got an MPL2 license after applying Gerv's patch
from bug 792727 [1] didn't lose it.

Suddenly, I've realized that I've committed a change in a searchplugin
file which is covered by P12n policy [2]. There are other files
subject to P12n bugs which have got the MPL2 license (namely,
mail/chrome/messenger-region/region.properties and
mail/searchplugins/*.xml).

My question is: as those files were included in Gerv's patch for
l10n-mozilla-aurora, can I commit those files in l10n-central without
needing a P12n bug, as long as no other changes are done in them?

TIA

[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792727
[2] http://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/es-ES/rev/422cf4ad893a#l15.1


--
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees

[Axel Hecht]

Hi Ricardo,

thanks for asking. Yes, the relicensing is fine, both because it's not
changing the actual bits that touch 3rd parties, and because it's
covered by a bug that explains why the change was made.

Axel