Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

aurora trees updating for newer locales again

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Axel Hecht

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 11:24:21 AM11/9/12
to
Hi,

there were a few locales for which aurora didn't update on the dashboard,

ach, csb, ff, lij, ms, sw, wo

for Firefox.

Please check your dashboards again.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805057 is the bug, and it
was a process mishap during the last merge day, which went undeciphered
for a bit because I was on PTO.

Axel

Justin Wood (Callek)

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 12:10:47 AM11/12/12
to Axel Hecht
Axel,
I also saw a similar issue with Locale be. for SeaMonkey

I had CC'ed you on the bug I filed
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=809739

~Justin Wood (Callek)

Axel Hecht

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 7:34:26 AM11/12/12
to
On 12.11.12 06:10, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> Axel,
> I also saw a similar issue with Locale be. for SeaMonkey
>
> I had CC'ed you on the bug I filed
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=809739

That's a different issue, actually. The locale didn't have updates for a
while, and thus doesn't show up in the queries. If you look at the
versions 1-3 back (don't recall which), you'll see the pushes.

The easiest way to make this pop up for sign-off is to push a dummy
change, possibly to both aurora and beta.

Axel

Justin Wood (Callek)

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 3:48:26 PM11/12/12
to Axel Hecht
Axel Hecht wrote:
> That's a different issue, actually. The locale didn't have updates for a
> while, and thus doesn't show up in the queries. If you look at the
> versions 1-3 back (don't recall which), you'll see the pushes.
>
> The easiest way to make this pop up for sign-off is to push a dummy
> change, possibly to both aurora and beta.

I would love if you could fix the dashboard to always show at least the
few most recent pushes/compares.

Having to push a change to an l10n teams hg repo, as a product driver is
completely sub-optimal to me.

--
~Justin Wood (Callek)

Axel Hecht

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 5:21:16 PM11/12/12
to
What'd be "most recent" in your reading? aka, how to decide what to show
in a world where appversions flow across repos?

There's bug 658656, but that only covers showing more data along the app
as it covers different trees, not spanning trees.

If you could spec this out, that'd be helpful.

Axel

Justin Wood (Callek)

unread,
Nov 12, 2012, 11:31:22 PM11/12/12
to Axel Hecht
If nothing else, "newer cset XYZ exists, allow us to diff to it and
signoff on it" nomatter if its 1 year old or 1 week old, or 1 minute old.

Such that we are *never* stuck on an old cset just because no-one
requested signoff for a while.

Is that spec enough to give us a way forward?

--
~Justin Wood (Callek)

0 new messages