Hi all,
I file a bug for tracking this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=883714
It's a meta bug because the work can be break into many pieces of work.
I will create more issues and maybe some API discussions according to the
hardware test items we have in hands.
Regards,
Evelyn
----- Original Message -----
> Thanks!
>
> Will we file a bug for this work?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Kevin Hu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Evelyn Hung" <
eh...@mozilla.com>
> > To: "Kevin Hu" <
k...@mozilla.com>
> > Cc: "Marco Chen" <
mc...@mozilla.com>, "b2g-internal"
> > <
b2g-in...@mozilla.org>, "Sandip Kamat" <
ska...@mozilla.com>,
> > "b2g-release-drivers" <
b2g-relea...@mozilla.org>, "Cervantes
> > Yu" <
c...@mozilla.com>, "Kan-Ru Chen"
> > <
kc...@mozilla.com>, "dev-gaia" <
dev-...@lists.mozilla.org>, "Gary
> > Chen" <
gc...@mozilla.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 7:04:14 PM
> > Subject: Re: Discussion of engineering mode and a general testing
> > app
> >
> > Yes, I can help.
> > I plan to collect some important test items from partners and break
> > down
> > to test cases and add them into UITest app.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Evelyn
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Thanks for Evelyn's comments.
> > > So, my understanding is, it looks like our proposals / ideas are
> > > almost the same. If there has anything different, please tell me.
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > So, Evelyn, are you driving the engineering work for the UITest
> > > app?
> > > Or someone else?
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kevin Hu
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Evelyn Hung" <
eh...@mozilla.com>
> > > > To: "Kan-Ru Chen" <
kc...@mozilla.com>, "dev-gaia"
> > > > <
dev-...@lists.mozilla.org>
> > > > Cc: "Marco Chen" <
mc...@mozilla.com>, "b2g-internal"
> > > > <
b2g-in...@mozilla.org>, "Sandip Kamat"
> > > > <
ska...@mozilla.com>,
> > > > "b2g-release-drivers" <
b2g-relea...@mozilla.org>,
> > > > "Cervantes
> > > > Yu" <
c...@mozilla.com>, "Kevin Hu"
> > > > <
k...@mozilla.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 3:30:15 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Discussion of engineering mode and a general
> > > > testing
> > > > app
> > > >
> > > > > > How do you address the above technical problems in this
> > > > > > proposal?
> > > > > > Without
> > > > > > opening some backdoor (XPCOM, mozChromeEvent, privileged
> > > > > > API,
> > > > > > etc.)
> > > > > > how will
> > > > > > the UITest app access the hardware functions directly?
> > > > > >
> > > > > UITest is an App, it should use WebAPI with correct
> > > > > permission
> > > > > declaration.
> > > > > If there is any hardware information that we don't want to
> > > > > expose
> > > > > via
> > > > > WebAPI, OEMs needs to implement their own private API. Regard
> > > > > to
> > > > > mozChromeEvent, I think we should examine all its use cases
> > > > > in
> > > > > System
> > > > > app,
> > > > > and redesign a proper event propagation path or use API
> > > > > instead.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > More information regard to Engineering mode (Eng-Mode):
> > > > As I know, OEMs use Eng-Mode application to test their hardware
> > > > within
> > > > their factory, they usually won't ship it. They will list their
> > > > test
> > > > items and write the their Eng-Mode application. They may need
> > > > to
> > > > implement their private API if we didn't have one that fulfills
> > > > their
> > > > needs.
> > > >
> > > > The extended UITest app I proposed here, is just a skeleton for
> > > > OEMs
> > > > reference. and I believe the UITest app will benefit us to
> > > > ensure
> > > > most API and event design aren't specific for Gaia system use
> > > > only.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Evelyn
> > > >
> > >
> >
>