Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Installing Firefox Manually

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Jim Carlock

unread,
Jun 27, 2006, 11:58:34 AM6/27/06
to
Does anyone know where to find some help on installing Firefox
manually (i.e. without the setup.exe file)?

Thank you for any help.

--
Jim Carlock
Post replies to the group, please.


nrth...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 28, 2006, 8:51:35 AM6/28/06
to
Jim Carlock wrote:
> Does anyone know where to find some help on installing Firefox
> manually (i.e. without the setup.exe file)?

For Firefox 1.5.0.x, setup.exe can be unpacked with any 7-zip aware
archive program, giving a bunch of xpi files. If you extract those
(with anything zip aware) you'll get a bin/ dir which is basically the
same as what the old zip files were. Just ignore the multiple
install.js - they aren't needed. Obviously this doesn't set any
registry keys, but uninstalling is as simple as deleting the folder.

Alternatively, Portable Firefox might be useful to you:
http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/browsers/portable_firefox

Jim Carlock

unread,
Jul 4, 2006, 4:48:30 PM7/4/06
to
nrthomas posted:
> Unpack the Firefox 1.5.0.x setup.exe (a 7-zip zipped file).
> This presents a bunch of xpi files. If you extract those (with
> zip aware software) you get a bin folder... Ignore all install.js
> files - not needed. This fails to configure the registry keys but

> uninstalling is as simple as deleting the folder.
>
> Alternatively, Portable Firefox might be useful to you:
> http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/browsers/portable_firefox

Thanks, nrthomas.

I unpacked the .exe when I first started messing with it. It
started out as some difficulties running two different versions
of Firefox. Firefox seems to check for something... it's not so
much a mutex, but if version 1.00 runs, and you start up 1.5,
you end up running 1.00 as so proclaimed by the app that
runs.

The registry entries provide a way to start a specific Firefox
version which ends up as a Windows limitation. I know a
way to fix this limitation but it's ugly and means developing
an app to present a selection of choices and run the selected
choice. I put the concept of a window running as a menu for
selecting which application to run, into the public domain (if
possible to protect the idea from patents, Microsoft's right-
click kind of does this already, but I'm advancing it as an
executable application or other library that responds to a left
click, middle-click, or other click, and runs as a service or
driver or other type of software/firmware/hardware that runs
when an operating system starts).

So there's some kind of versioning mutexing going on.

--
Jim Carlock
Post replies to group.


Robert Strong

unread,
Jul 4, 2006, 5:19:41 PM7/4/06
to dev-apps...@lists.mozilla.org
Jim Carlock wrote:
> I unpacked the .exe when I first started messing with it. It
> started out as some difficulties running two different versions
> of Firefox. Firefox seems to check for something... it's not so
> much a mutex, but if version 1.00 runs, and you start up 1.5,
> you end up running 1.00 as so proclaimed by the app that
> runs.
Read up on MOZ_NO_REMOTE but be sure to read up on it before using it
since this has limitations in regards to the profiles that are used.
http://www.google.com/search?q=MOZ_NO_REMOTE
0 new messages