Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Release schedule of Lightning 1.9.2 ?
40 views
Skip to first unread message
Stefan Sitter
Apr 23, 2013, 6:36:23 AM4/23/13
to
Hi,
what is the time schedule of the Lightning 1.9.2 bugfix release?
Are there open bugs that need help to fix or verify? Maybe there exists
an unofficial list somewhere because I failed to find them in bugzilla
whiteboard search.
Stefan
what is the time schedule of the Lightning 1.9.2 bugfix release?
Are there open bugs that need help to fix or verify? Maybe there exists
an unofficial list somewhere because I failed to find them in bugzilla
whiteboard search.
Stefan
Philipp Kewisch
Apr 28, 2013, 5:24:49 AM4/28/13
to
there is no unofficial list, at the moment there are just no bugs aside
from 833720 that need to go into a 1.9.2 release. Do you think we should
do an 1.9.2 release with this bug only? If you want to suggest any other
bugs, please do let me know.
Philipp
Stefan Sitter
Apr 28, 2013, 8:25:21 AM4/28/13
to
On 28.04.2013 11:24, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> On 4/23/13 12:36 PM, Stefan Sitter wrote:
>> what is the time schedule of the Lightning 1.9.2 bugfix release?
>>
>> Are there open bugs that need help to fix or verify? Maybe there
>> exists an unofficial list somewhere because I failed to find them
>> in bugzilla whiteboard search.
>>
> On 4/23/13 12:36 PM, Stefan Sitter wrote:
>> what is the time schedule of the Lightning 1.9.2 bugfix release?
>>
>> Are there open bugs that need help to fix or verify? Maybe there
>> exists an unofficial list somewhere because I failed to find them
>> in bugzilla whiteboard search.
>>
> there is no unofficial list, at the moment there are just no bugs
> aside from 833720 that need to go into a 1.9.2 release. Do you think
> we should do an 1.9.2 release with this bug only? If you want to
> suggest any other bugs, please do let me know.
Bug 833720 won't affect many users but Bug 757762 "[Linux] alarms too
> aside from 833720 that need to go into a 1.9.2 release. Do you think
> we should do an 1.9.2 release with this bug only? If you want to
> suggest any other bugs, please do let me know.
late / internal time wrong after resuming from sleep / suspend /
hibernation mode" does and is already checked in for 1.9.2 too.
From looking at the bugs fixed for 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 I don't see other
1.9.x candidates at the moment. Updating the built-in timezones might be
worth considering but unfortunately this update has l10n impact due to
new added timezones.
I think if there are no more bugs scheduled for 1.9.x then there is no
reason to delay the 1.9.2 release.
Stefan
Matthew Mecca
Apr 28, 2013, 1:10:04 PM4/28/13
to
On 04/28/2013 08:25 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote:
> I think if there are no more bugs scheduled for 1.9.x then there is no
> reason to delay the 1.9.2 release.
Agreed.
> I think if there are no more bugs scheduled for 1.9.x then there is no
> reason to delay the 1.9.2 release.
Matt
0 new messages