Neuropsychopharmacology Abbreviation

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Brayan Jacobsen

unread,

Aug 3, 2024, 2:26:31 PM8/3/24

to motinsmilti

The abbreviation of the journal title "Neuropsychopharmacology reports" is "Neuropsychopharmacol. Rep.". It is the recommended abbreviation to be used for abstracting, indexing and referencing purposes and meets all criteria of the ISO 4 standard for abbreviating names of scientific journals.

The ISO 4 abbreviation system, created by the International Organization for Standardization, serves to abbreviate journal titles in a consistent manner. This method streamlines citation processes and enhances the clarity of journal identification within academic settings.

The abbreviation of journal titles follows ISO (International Organization for Standardization) for an array of subjects, NLM (National Library of Medicine) for biomedical sciences, and CASSI (CAS Source Index) for chemistry and related disciplines.

Neuropsychopharmacology is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Nature Portfolio. It was established in 1987 and is an official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. The journal covers all aspects of neuropsychopharmacology, including clinical and basic science research into the brain and behavior, the properties of agents acting within the central nervous system, and drug targeting and development. In addition to primary articles and reviews, the journal publishes Brainpod, a podcast highlighting content published in the journal and featuring interviews with the authorship team.[1]

This list shows the abbreviations used for journal titles as cited works. Copy the abbreviated (boldface) title from this list and paste it in the Cited Work field on the Cited Reference Search page.

Awards
As part of its mission to encourage high-quality research, ECNP offers a wide variety of awards designed to recognise and stimulate outstanding research in neuropsychopharmacology and related disciplines in Europe:

Liaison with other key organisations in the field
To facilitate direct dialogues with other scientific bodies and indirect dialogues with the European Union Commissions, the European Parliament and the World Health Organization (WHO), as well as other decision-making bodies, ECNP is also member of:

CAS provides abstracts of articles, and indexes bibliographic, substance, and reaction information from key scientific journals such as those shown below. This information may appear within days of article publication.

The journal list below is sorted alphabetically by the full title and also includes the journal abbreviation and CODEN. This is not the full list of publications covered by CAS, and the list is subject to change.

European Neuropsychopharmacology has an h-index of 124. It means 124 articles of this journal have more than 124 number of citations.The h-index is a way of measuring the productivity and citation impact of the publications. The h-index is defined as the maximum value of h such that the given journal/author has published h papers that have each been cited at least h number of times.

The overall rank of European Neuropsychopharmacology is 2283.According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 1.442. SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals. It considers the number of citations received by a journal and the importance of the journals from where these citations come.

The IS0 4 standard abbreviation of European Neuropsychopharmacology is Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol..This abbreviation ('Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.') is well recommended and approved for the purpose of indexing, abstraction, referencing and citing goals.It meets all the essential criteria of ISO 4 standard.

The acceptance rate/percentage of any academic journal/conference depends upon many parameters. Some of the critical parameters are listed below.

The demand or interest of researchers/scientists in publishing in a specific Journal/Conference.
Peer review complexity and timeline.
The mix of unsolicited and invited submissions.
The time it takes from manuscript submission to final publication.
And Many More.

It is essential to understand that the acceptance rate/rejection rate of papers varies among journals. Some Journals considers all the manuscripts submissions as a basis of acceptance rate computation. On the other hand, few consider the only manuscripts sent for peer review or few even not bother about the accurate maintenance of total submissions. Hence, it can provide a rough estimation only.

All articles published in Acta Neuropsychiatrica undergo peer review. The authors should suggest five potential peer reviewers in their submission. The contact details of suggested reviewers should be institutional email addresses where possible or include the reviewers' ORCID.

Consult a current issue of the Journal for style and format. The manuscript should be typed double-spaced throughout on 'Letter' or A4 paper and in Word format. Pages should be numbered sequentially beginning with the Title Page. Margins should not be less than 2.5 cm on all sides, and the font should be clearly legible and uniform throughout.

Original research articles Original articles report the results of original research and are intended for full-scale basic or clinical studies including large controlled trials. Translational work is encouraged, but not required.

Commentaries Commentaries focus attention on scientific issues in the field of the journal, and should highlight, discuss and amplify these issues. Commentaries are invited by the Editor-in-Chief

For abbreviations and symbols use Units, Symbols and Abbreviations for Authors and Editors in Medicine Related Sciences, Sixth Edition. Edited by D.N. Baron and M McKenzie Clarke. ISBN: 9781853156243, Paperback, April, 2008. All terms or abbreviations should be fully explained at first mention. All units should be metric. Use no Roman numerals. Abbreviations are not allowed in titles, headings and "Aims of the Study".

More information about the nomenclature can be found on the ECNP website, and in the paper by Zohar et al. (2014). The Neuroscience-based Nomenclature (NbN) itself is available free of charge as a mobile app (for both Android and iOS devices).

Provide up to 3 Significant Outcomes encapsulating the 'take-home messages' of the article, and identify the main issues addressed with particular emphasis on the scientific significance. The Significant Outcomes are to be presented succinctly (1 max 2 sentences each), in tabulated form, and logically emerge from the conclusions of the paper (without repeating). However, they must not be dogmatic, raise new issues or pose further questions.

Limitations In addition, each original article must cite up to 3 noteworthy Limitations. These should inform the reader about potential weaknesses, for instance in aspects of study design, methodology, analyses, the wider generalizability, or the wider application of findings. The Significant Outcomes and the Limitations are placed immediately below the Abstract/Keywords.

Provide up to 3 significant Summations encapsulating the 'take-home messages' of the paper, and identify the main issues addressed with particular emphasis on their clinical and/or scientific significance. The Summations should be presented succinctly (1 max 2 sentences each), in tabulated form, and logically emerge from the conclusions of the paper (without repeating). However, they must not be dogmatic, raise new issues or pose further questions.

Considerations In addition, each review article must cite up to 3 noteworthy Considerations in which authors essentially criticize the summations and include any caveats or limitations either of the review process or its conclusions. The Summations and Considerations are placed immediately below the Abstract/Keywords.

Perspectives In addition, each perspective article must cite up to 3 noteworthy perspectives in which authors essentially criticize the summations and include any caveats or limitations either of the perspective or its conclusions. The Summations and Perspectives are placed immediately below the Abstract/Keywords.

An Animal Welfare Ethical Statement (see Ethical standards below) must be included for all studies involving animals. Furthermore, we encourage authors to include a supplementary file containing detailed experimental information according to the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines. Please use this journal template: ARRIVE Methods

2) The Harvard (author-date) system should be used in the text and a complete list of References cited given at the end of the article. In a text citation of a work by more than two authors, cite the first author's name followed by et al. (but the names of all of the authors should be given in the References section). Where several references are cited together they should be listed in rising date order.

4) References to material published online should follow a similar style, with the URL included at the end of the reference, with the accession date, if known. Authors are requested to print out and keep a copy of any online-only information, in case the URL changes or is no longer maintained. Examples follow:

Abstracts cannot be used as references unless published in an indexed scientific journal. Include manuscripts accepted, but not published; designate the abbreviated title of the journal followed by (in press). Papers published electronically, not yet hard copy publication should be identified by their DOI-number. Information from manuscripts not yet accepted should be cited in the text as personal communication. References must be verified by the authors against the original documents. Titles of journals should be abbreviated in accordance with MEDLINE ( ).