MOTECH Architecture

On 5/4/12 5:39 AM, Sanchit Bahal wrote: Currently, only the IVR Kookoo module has support for

Comments inline On 5/2/12 1:42 PM, Bruce MacLeod wrote: Hello Rob, Thank you for sending this on. It

That sounds correct to me. Are there any situations where we wouldn't get a call disconnect/hang-

My preference would be to have a process for deleting branches, so the set of live branches are those

Good questions. Will start with some quick responses for the purposes of continuing the discussion. I

Hi, I'm judging that there not a lot of passion around this programme so I would like to withdraw

I am including Aravind into this. In terms of concrete development Drishti project in Karnataka (

Hi Bruce, The intention of the below commit was just to ensure that the end date of the message

As requested, here are some ideas for coding conventions in the MoTeCH platform 1) Event

Yes that would be useful. We should look at when moving this into platform. @Sanchit, can we add this

I think these changes should make their way back into the master platform branch platform-ivr changes

Some comments inline On 01/03/2012 03:12 PM, Sanchit Bahal wrote: Understanding / Approach The OSGi

I would push for option 3. I can coordinate with the INSTEDD team to get the work you need moved up

Some quick responses inline. On 12/05/2011 11:17 AM, Bruce MacLeod wrote: > 1) Should we adopt

Bruce, thanks for raising these issues. It's always useful to discuss things and I think this

I guess the issues has been: - lack of understanding on our part as to what is really required to

Hi, I have created an issue in Jira for upgrading our production environment to 1.8.2. It is worth

This one is going away as we are doing the call record implementation more like asterisk where at the

Can we move the packages internal to the motech-ivr-koo module out of the org.motechproject.ivr

-- Vivek Singh | +91 98452 32929 | http://sites.google.com/site/petmongrels | petmongrels@twitter

I feel it is better to move it to Wednesday. Puneet (puneet.nexus1) On Sep 20, 2011 3:47 PM, "

I was thinking about this schedule tracking/rule engine thing again, and I was wondering if maybe we

Just a couple of responses: 1) I don't think the only reason to use the rule engine is because

We need to start thinking about how to expose SMS functionality within the platform. I've taken a

Thinking about this some more I think we may need those attributes but they should be optional.