Hi all
I have seen plenty of examples where evaluators/facilitators/researchers code the contents of MSC stories
But here I am interested to hear of examples where they code/categorise the types of "significance" criteria that participants report using, after having selected a MSC story. (BUT not those criteria some groups decided to use in advance)
I am especially interested in any emergent categorisations of selection criteria
Genuinely "asking for a friend" :-)
regards, rick