Groups
Groups
Sign in
Groups
Groups
Morehouse Philosophy 101
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
final paper
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Nathan Nobis
unread,
Apr 24, 2009, 3:09:23 PM
4/24/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to morehouse-philosophy-101
Final paper assignment, due at the time of the final:
First, read
James Pryor's Guidelines on Writing a Philosophy Paper
.
Then, pick
one
of the articles below and write a 4-5 page paper on it where you (1) identify the author's main thesis, (2) the argument(s) in favor of that thesis and (3) evaluate the argument as sound or unsound and (4) respond to objections.
Daniel Howard Snyder,
"Theodicy,"
in ed. Kelly James Clark,
Readings in the Philosophy of Religion
(Broadview 2008, 2nd edition).
Is It Wrong Everywhere, Always, and for Anyone to Believe Anything on Insufficient Evidence?
by Peter Van Inwagen
Saul Smilansky,
"
The Ethical Advantages of Hard Determinism
", PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH vol.54 (1994), pp.355-363.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
,
Peter Singer
,
Philosophy and Public Affairs
,
vol. 1, no. 1 (Spring 1972), pp. 229-243
John Simmons, "
Reasonable Humans and Animals
"
I
will find some more sample papers soon!
--
Nathan Nobis, Ph.D.
Philosophy, Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA
http://www.NathanNobis.com
nathan...@gmail.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages