Re: [Moq] Digest for moqdisc@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic

[Neil Haughton]

I'm curious. Are you referring to VB or VB.net? If the latter even if  the app is written in that could you not write the tests in C# and get the benefit of full lambda support?

Neil Haughton
(from my mobile phone)

On Aug 11, 2013 1:45 AM, <moq...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/moqdisc/topics

• MOQ vs VB9 :-( [1 Update]

 MOQ vs VB9 :-(

Daniel Cazzulino <dan...@cazzulino.com> Aug 10 12:38AM -0300  

Yup, sucks to have partial lambda support in VB. It's not in scope for Moq
to add anything to alleviate that, I'm afraid.
 
Rhino might be your safe bet there. You could say it excels at legacy code
bases, being kinda legacy itself ;)
 
 
/kzu
 
--
Daniel Cazzulino
 
 


 

--
--
Post: moq...@googlegroups.com
Unsubscribe: moqdisc-u...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Moq Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to moqdisc+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Daniel Cazzulino]

VB IS VB.NET :P. Who does "plain" VB anymore? ;)

I understand they want/have to write VB code for tests (for whatever reason). Yes, writing the tests in C# is all it would take, but learning a new language may not be very productive for them (much less productive than just switching mocking libraries ;))

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino