Moq Discussions

I rewrote to this: foreach (var i in items) { mock.Setup( x => x.GetItem( i.x, i.y ) ).Returns<

I was going to ask the same. On 9 December 2015 at 13:12, Arno Brouwer <tallde...@gmail.com

That's true, but as R# suggest, it's just a warning. I doesn't mean that is forbidden. (

I tried the second one but why it is not working. On Monday, November 9, 2015 at 8:25:28 AM UTC-5,

I think It.IsAny is meant to be used when you verify the behaviour of the mock. I recommend you to

No problem. I think all goes down to two choices: The first one, is refactor your code. I strongly

I am trying to MOQ a CRM Plugin. The plugin receives a number of properties and I want to ensure that

I guess in the ACT section you are missing the call to: keCallFlowApplicationMock.HandleCall() (Which

hi i have a method is repository public bool UpdateEffectiveDate(int driverId, DateTime effectiveDate

hi can anyone help how to write moq for entity for the method given below. especially for properties

DbProviderFactories is a static class. You can't mock that. (At least not with moq). ~ Ale

I disagree because for the "real mock" in the test I have to use Strict Mock(here're

Phillip, You can use It.IsAny<> to ignore supplying any specific parameter value or use lamda

Updating to latest v4.2.xxx of Moq fixed this for me. On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 00:08:08 UTC,

Hi Using Moq with csla for mocking,new to Moq, while saving a editable business object with child

I have come up with a solution for the moment that works for me. It needs expanding and possibly some

​I think this might still be in Moq 3ish syntax, but it's just off the top of my head so you may

Hello there, Use Moq to control dependencies and do unit level testing. In your case, it seems like

There is no class to have state because Moq doesn't instantiate an instance of it. Instead it

Sounds like this should be supported. Can you create an issue in github please? (Moq4 project) /kzu

Hello, is it possible to use Linq to Mock to set return value null? // This doesn't work: var

Using the imperative style, I have a Mocked object that has behavior common to all my unit tests to

Maybe a good place to start would be SignalR tests themselves? They use Moq too... https://github.com

there's a key issue here that I think is missing: a sequence can be used across several mocks. So

Just had a similar problem. In my case the solution was to change the access modifier of the method

I scanned the PR and it looks good. I like the cleanup you've done too, separates the

The answers on SO are spot-on on this. /kzu -- Daniel Cazzulino On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Paul

No worries! On the contrary, good questions make us wonder if we're satisfying everyone's

VB IS VB.NET :P. Who does "plain" VB anymore? ;) I understand they want/have to write VB

Yup, sucks to have partial lambda support in VB. It's not in scope for Moq to add anything to