There are two things I do to make "grading" discussions manageable.
For one, I ask students to fill out a "quiz" weekly, where the
questions are prompts for self-reflection on their own participation.
The rubric is built into their quiz, and they rate themselves - and I
can override their rating if I think they are being to hard on
themselves or too glowing. I don't grade all the discussion entries!
Heaven's, I have hundreds - so it would be impractical (and not very
meaningful).
To your other point, though, I agree that contact time can be HIGHER
than in a F2F course. I don't really mind, because I'm trading off
"time spent lecturing at them" + "office hours" with "facilitating
discussion between all of us". In the end, I still think I'm spending
slightly more time than for a face to face course. I would be very
interesting in hearing what everyone else thinks about this. In fact,
is anyone collecting data on how much time it takes to teach online
vs. F2F? Here's my data point:
* 1 unit course
* Full semester taught in a compressed 6 week time period (2x
compressed)
* Students average 8-10 hours per week
* I average 10-15 hours per week
How does that compare to anyone else's teaching load?
- Jim Vanides
"Science of Sound" - MSU online (
www.scienceteacher.org)