A&O Manuel Cerón 2009-07-10: MonoDevelop Class Designer
Manuel Alejandro Cerón Estrada
* Finish ClassFigure. [DONE]
* Integrate the MHD Designer Program into MonoDevelop [DONE]
* Generate Class Figures from DOM Metadata [DONE]
Objectives:
* Complete TypeFigure and subclasses: Interface, Class, Enum, Struct.
* Fixproblems with SimpleTextFigure in MonoHotDraw
* Improve ClassDesignerView
* Improve Figure generation
Bonus:
* Next monday is the deadline for the midterm report. I made a very
simple video of the progress. This still a very early preview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRYl0PAluUg
High Quality: http://www.unicauca.edu.co/~ceronman/blog/monodevelop/ClassDesigner.ogv
Comments:
* Someone asked me where is my code for the project, and I realized
that I've never wrote about that in previous A&O reports. I'm writing
the Add In in the same solution as MonoHotDraw, which is stored in the
Mono's subversion repository. This is for practical reasons, since I
have to modify both the add in and monohotdraw very frequently.
* I'm writing the code for MonoDevelop 2.0 stable. I was first using
MonoDevelop SVN Head but this ended being very very difficult. Because
SVN version is often very unstable. So I decided to use 2.0 for
developing and later port to 2.1. The API changes just a few. Is there
a better approach?
Rodrigo Kumpera
Achievements:
* Finish ClassFigure. [DONE]
* Integrate the MHD Designer Program into MonoDevelop [DONE]
* Generate Class Figures from DOM Metadata [DONE]
Objectives:
* Complete TypeFigure and subclasses: Interface, Class, Enum, Struct.
* Fixproblems with SimpleTextFigure in MonoHotDraw
* Improve ClassDesignerView
* Improve Figure generation
Bonus:
* Next monday is the deadline for the midterm report. I made a very
simple video of the progress. This still a very early preview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRYl0PAluUg
Very nice video, great job.
Miguel de Icaza
Loved the video as well.
* I'm writing the code for MonoDevelop 2.0 stable. I was first using
MonoDevelop SVN Head but this ended being very very difficult. Because
SVN version is often very unstable. So I decided to use 2.0 for
developing and later port to 2.1. The API changes just a few. Is there
a better approach?
Since 2.0 is stable and there is little need to work on 2.1 right now, this sounds like a very sensible approach.