Pablo Iñigo Blasco wrote:
> ACHIEVEMENTS
>
> * To implement EntitySet support, at least reading operations. [DONE] we
> already can use EntitySets like in CLR, ie:
> employee.Orders.First(o=>o.Freight>0.0). Besides many of EntitySet 's
> methods are already implemented: IList methods, Assign, SetSource...
That's a great news :)
> * To build a little report about the state of System.Data.Linq classes
> exclusive of mono (not existing in DbLinq, ie: DbLinq uses
> CLR/System.Data.Linq.Mapping namespace) trying to detect potential
> problems and different behaviours between DbLinq project and
> Mono/System.Data.Linq.
To my understanding, S.D.L.Mapping types are almost abstract and
attribute-based mapping types are implemented in DBLinq. (XML-based
mapping is not AFAIR.) In other words, MS would not have implementation
that shows behavioral differences. Is there any different issue
known yet?
Atsushi Eno
To my understanding, S.D.L.Mapping types are almost abstract and
attribute-based mapping types are implemented in DBLinq. (XML-based
mapping is not AFAIR.) In other words, MS would not have implementation
that shows behavioral differences. Is there any different issue
known yet?