[Mono-dev] GSoC 2012 - Iterest

[Gustavo Torrico Martinez]

Hello Mono Team

My Name is Gustavo Torrico and i am from Bolivia.

I am developer of .NET technologies since 5 years ago, and i've developed with Mono since 3 years ago for desktop and for mobile. I am very excited to collaborate with the project.

I am interesting in 3 projects without no order of preference:

-              “Make ASP.NET Awesome in MonoDevelop”

-              “QT# Bindings with CXXI”

-              “Add Razor Syntax Support to MonoDevelop”

But I have the next questions:

What is meant by a non-trivial application? For define the scope of the project (QT #)

What about the problem with dependencies libraries in ASP.NET MVC3? (http://www.mono-project.com/Release_Notes_Mono_2.10#ASP.NET_MVC3_Support)

 

Regards,

Gustavo Torrico Martinez

Universidad Privada del Valle - Bolivia

[Andreia Gaita]

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:52, Gustavo Torrico Martinez <gat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am developer of .NET technologies since 5 years ago, and i've developed with Mono since 3 years ago for desktop and for mobile. I am very excited to collaborate with the project.
>
> I am interesting in 3 projects without no order of preference:
>
> -              “Make ASP.NET Awesome in MonoDevelop”
>
> -              “QT# Bindings with CXXI”
>
> -              “Add Razor Syntax Support to MonoDevelop”

Regarding asp.net and razor, MS has just opensourced a bunch of code, which could potentially change the scope of these projects. You should look at what's available now and talk to the monodevelop devs about it.

 
>
> What is meant by a non-trivial application? For define the scope of the project (QT #)

Something bigger than an Hello World window, preferably :) The goal is to exercise the bindings so that the app serves as proof of implementation, a sample, and also a test for the bindings. There's a lot of QT apps out there, you can suggest one or more apps and we can decide which one would be better fitted. It could be that an app that initially looks like a good choice for testing the bindings turns out not to be, so it's a topic open for discussion in the proposal and during the project.

 
>
> What about the problem with dependencies libraries in ASP.NET MVC3? (http://www.mono-project.com/Release_Notes_Mono_2.10#ASP.NET_MVC3_Support)

I'm not sure what dependencies there are, but this may have changed with the newly opensourced stuff from MS. 

andreia gaita
--------------------
blog.worldofcoding.com
andreiagaita.net

github.com/andreiagaita

[Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Andreia Gaita <shana...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:52, Gustavo Torrico Martinez <gat...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I am developer of .NET technologies since 5 years ago, and i've developed
>> with Mono since 3 years ago for desktop and for mobile. I am very excited to
>> collaborate with the project.
>>
>> I am interesting in 3 projects without no order of preference:
>>
>> -              “Make ASP.NET Awesome in MonoDevelop”
>>
>> -              “QT# Bindings with CXXI”
>>
>> -              “Add Razor Syntax Support to MonoDevelop”
>
> Regarding asp.net and razor, MS has just opensourced a bunch of code, which
> could potentially change the scope of these projects. You should look at
> what's available now and talk to the monodevelop devs about it.
>
>
>
>>
>> What is meant by a non-trivial application? For define the scope of the
>> project (QT #)
>
> Something bigger than an Hello World window, preferably :) The goal is to
> exercise the bindings so that the app serves as proof of implementation, a
> sample, and also a test for the bindings. There's a lot of QT apps out
> there, you can suggest one or more apps and we can decide which one would be
> better fitted. It could be that an app that initially looks like a good
> choice for testing the bindings turns out not to be, so it's a topic open
> for discussion in the proposal and during the project.
>

One can also write a port of GTK# application, there are many options,
but what I prefer is a database driver application like address book,
because database is where Qt is weaker, with C# it can be much more
simple.
AFAIK most challenging part of this project will be translating Qt
style event handling into .Net style.

>
>
>>
>> What about the problem with dependencies libraries in ASP.NET MVC3?
>> (http://www.mono-project.com/Release_Notes_Mono_2.10#ASP.NET_MVC3_Support)
>
> I'm not sure what dependencies there are, but this may have changed with the
> newly opensourced stuff from MS.
>
>
> andreia gaita
> --------------------
> blog.worldofcoding.com
> andreiagaita.net
> github.com/andreiagaita
>
>

> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-de...@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-de...@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list