The way AMS separates serialization from business logic is very clean, but at first glance the caching solution of mongoid-cached-json seems to be nice and AMS doesn't have one yet. Is there any feasible possibility to use mongoid-cached-json with AMS?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mongoid-cached-json" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mongoid-cached-...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
dB. | Moscow - Geneva - Seattle - New York
code.dblock.org - @dblockdotorg - artsy.net - github/dblock
https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/pull/89
https://gist.github.com/chancancode/5ad770c4b6c85eebe54c
Since the serializer returns JSON I suspect that a solution equivalent to mongoid-cached-json can be built by borrowing the caching parts. But since mongoid-cached-json is effectively the presenter portion as well I doubt that you can mix these two "as-is".
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:53 PM, <bog...@grafidelity.de> wrote:
The way AMS separates serialization from business logic is very clean, but at first glance the caching solution of mongoid-cached-json seems to be nice and AMS doesn't have one yet. Is there any feasible possibility to use mongoid-cached-json with AMS?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mongoid-cached-json" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mongoid-cached-json+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mongoid-cached-...@googlegroups.com.