I would like you to read the
following..this is a New Zealand Politican that was voted out, now loves his
life and has written quite frankly about our political system..I think you will
enjoy this .....
Former Napier MP Russell Fairbrother Happier now
he's out of
Parliament
By
Neill Gordon of HB Country
Scene
Parliament was like a prison for former Napier MP
Russell
Fairbrother.
Napier people did him a favour voting him
out last year,
ending six "wasted years" in politics, he
says.
Initially seduced by appointments to influential
committees
and his anointing as a future Attorney General, he ended
up
feeling trapped in a system that prioritised patch protection
and power
instead of what politics is truly about: "improving
the life of
individuals."
"I just couldn't click into the thought pro- cess. I
could never
get my head round it. I'd get on that plane [to Wellington] on
Tuesday
morning and my heart would sink.
I'd think 'I just hate this'
".
The conditions at Parliament were tougher than at
Mangaroa
Prison, he says.
He'd arrive at seven in the morning,
couldn't leave till 10 at
night, and couldn't leave the premises without
permission
from a party whip.
"So you're trapped in this
building 15 hours a day, three days
a week... I felt
imprisoned."
Parliament's stupidly long hours manufacture poor
decisions,
the 65-year-old says.
"You've got middle-aged people
who are on the go from at
least seven in the morning till at least 10 at
night and you
point me to 45, 55, 65-year-olds who can make good
rational
decisions when they've been awake and
concentrating at their place of
business for 15 or 17 hours a
day.
"Some of the most important
decisions are made under these
punishing conditions.
"Often
meetings go till midnight or later and often they're
late because they're
crisis meetings.
"So you're supposed to make contributions which
require
quick thinking and accurate thinking, which is quite
stupid."
Politics demands MPs become salesmen for party policy
and
fosters "bully personalities", he says.
Russell couldn't and
wouldn't play the game. He'd built a
successful legal career as an
articulate, charismatic
persuader, but as a politician he came across as dull
and
humourless.
"I withdrew. I lost my sense of humour; I lost
my voice. I
couldn't even give a good speech as a politician.
"I
was resistant to the skills you have to acquire, which are
skills of making
yourself seem more important than you
really are and of suppressing other
people's importance. It
just didn't wash with me."
Despite his
disillusionment with Parliament he maintains he
is "really glad" he had the
experience.
"It's a rare opportunity to have and, being near the
apex of
power, you do see how people work and you do see what's
wrong back
on the streets and so I have been pleased to
come back and work at a low
level at the bar.
"I don't take too much work on and I turn away a
lot more
than I take on. I do a lot of work for free. I do a lot of
work
where I get paid with some gift, a bottle of wine, some-
times just a
hug and it's quite rewarding.
"It takes me right back to what
politics is all about - trying to
improve the life of individuals; not trying
to strengthen the
position of people with power.
"In all the
debate over the Auckland super city or the debate
beginning
on Hawke's Bay local body amalgamation, no-
one is saying someone living on
$30,000 somewhere is
going to measurably better off; the lives of individuals
don't
come into it."
The contrast between the "good honest
argument" of the
courtroom and vote- blinkered MPs was a huge
frustration
for him.
Russell tried to set up a committee to try
and get a New
Zealand definition of justice,
but MPs "weren't interested in
big picture stuff, it was what would garner
them votes next
week in their electorate".
Whereas a barrister
operates under one rule - you don't
knowingly mislead the court - MPs
"mislead the public all
the time".
"You're effectively a
salesperson and you're delivering a
version of the facts. Like we'd trot out
unemployment stats,
trot out this and that.
"Working for
Families is a classic. That was a key plank of
the Labour Party, a very good
part. But it took the Child
Poverty Action Group to take a case to the Human
Rights
Commission to prove that it was in fact
discriminatory.
"Because if you were a child of a family on a
benefit you
didn't get the largesse that Working for Families offered
the
child of a parent earning the same money who was in
employment. The
theory being, of course, to get people off
the benefit into employment but
you couldn't go out and say
this policy is disenfranchising kids of
beneficiaries because
that wasn't politically correct. You had to say Working
for
Families is the best thing since sliced bread.
"You sell
them. It's policy rather than principle.
"Most backbench MPs could
not put hand on heart and say
they've done a productive day's work and many
cabinet
ministers couldn't do that either, because the work's done by
five
or six people.
"The normal currency on the street is money, you
work for a
dollar. In politics the currency is power and power comes
from
information so that - you see this happening in the
National Party, it's not
just a Labour Party thing - the few
people who run the country - there's
about five - they have
the information and they don't share it, they feed it
out to
you. It's like when you sell an insurance policy - this is
the
policy you're going to sell. You don't have planning sessions
you have
sales sessions in politics.
"John Key - and I'm not being party
political, it was no
different with us - with the Maori seats and smacking
bill, he
didn't say 'I'll take it to my caucus', he says, 'I've got
some
ideas, I'll take it to Cabinet on Monday' and then he
announced what
the outcome was.
"His caucus meets on Tuesday so the majority of
his MPs
had no idea what Cabi- net endorsed of his idea until they
read
the paper on Tuesday morning."
Russell says his recent suggestion
that the number of MPs
should be reduced from 121 to 60 or 70 was made
seriously.
Some MPs leave Parliament each week having
"done
nothing for three days, glad to get home and play
golf".
"MPs from some of the minor parties, they have nothing
to
do, they don't know what their idiosyncratic leaders are
doing until
they hear them stand up and say something and
you saw that the way the
Alliance broke
up," he says.
"With modern technology you don't need to be face to
face.
You don't need 121 MPs.
We used to have 90 MPs with
electorates of 15,000 people
and I think that was too many. I think we could
get by with
60 or 70 MPs. It would save the country a lot of
money.
Russell says he is far healthier now he is out of
politics.
"I don't snore like I used to, my health's better and
my
judgement's far better. I have time to let my head work
through issues
and think about things."