--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Monbiot Discussions" group.
To post to this group, send email to monbiot...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to monbiot-discu...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/monbiot-discuss?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Monbiot Discussions" group.
To post to this group, send email to monbiot...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to monbiot-discu...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/monbiot-discuss?hl=en.
Given that the society I grew up in stressed individualism, I'm not
sure that I'm happy with the idea of a "collectivist" society. Maybe
a "co-operative"...?
Then of course you run into the whole issue of the difference between
the political theory and the way it has been practiced.
Something to talk about on those winter nights...
Roger.
--
Do you (wherever you are) use the same definitions of "hardiness
zones" as are used in North America? To a great extent, it describes
the kinds of plants and varieties that we can grow. There are
micro-environments - being next to the Great Lakes I'm slightly warmer
through most of the winter but much colder in the spring... The farm
up the hill (1 km from me and the Bay) can easily have frost 3 or 4
weeks before I do.
Just curious.
Roger.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
I agree Lila - it frustrates me though that those, even on a local level, who wield the power, tend to - especially around here - be retired, relatively affluent, and relatively unscathed by the current economic situation. These people don't want their boat rocking, tend not to look past their 10 or 20 years or so left unless it's a cause dear to them - the new park benches, the condition of the church roof, how many dog litter bins there are and are they all being used. This is the reason I have pulled out of our local parish council - my voice was, although politely heard, pretty ineffectual, or so it felt. My time, apart from going towards nurturing the new orchard and growing crops for our own consumption, will now be put into the local Transition Town group who, although again largely made up of relatively affluent middle class people, are at least pushing for community growing projects, pushing in one direction, and, well - at least they're bloody pushing! This can be such a positive experience, but I have felt my time in the last two years on the PC has been bashing my head against a wall. The time to leave dawned on me as I spent a Sunday afternoon checking a fence around a PC owned lake to make sure no more dog walkers had cut the wire, followed by rocking grave stones in the local cemetery to make sure they wouldn't fall over.
At ours it's the flood drills after the great flood of 2001, when a lane in the village was submerged under a foot of water. On the other hand they're contesting the recent Environmental Agency's classification of much of the parish as being in flood plain as they're worried about house prices being affected. Because that's the important thing in the whole story - how much your house is worth...
I do think you're right concerning democracy. Since the corporates took over running ours and others countries, in all but name, I believe people have gradually become disenfranchised from the whole system. The idea that 'Why vote, I won't change anything', is one I always poo-pooed, but these days it's not so much a question of wasting a vote, but just a question of there's no one I want to vote for - they all seem so self-serving or stuck in their own particular ruts. I think that, coupled with the global communications where people can share ideas on an earth-scale, is helping movements like the Transition Town movement gain momentum. Pre-internet, for people to do something perceived as out of the ordinary, you would have to reach a critical mass in order to get it to happen. Now, a few small groups can look at each other across the internet and realise that whilst theyt may be a minority in their own country, their ideas and beliefs are shared by many more across the world, and they won't feel so alone or unusual, giving them the courage, inclination and ability to do their own thing.
So today we have groups of like-minded people, disenchanted with the democratic system, sick of politicians dodging the big questions, deciding to do their own thing. But they know there are a growing number of people locally, nationally and internationally, all doing their own thing too, which happens to be the same thing. They are large enough to affect local government, how long until they can affect national government, if at all? That is the global village I care about - global democracy as opposed to global capitalisation, which is what we currently have. The government no longer feels as though it serves the people, so let us serve ourselves as best we can.
On a side note, my father sits on a community council in Scotland (the equivalent of the English parish councils), and he is also, by proxy, on the village hall committee. As part of the latter, he has been put forward to be the representative for some national village hall group representative, to sit on yet another committee. This committee, which I assume oversees the interests of Scotland's village halls, has a salary drawing chairperson. It doesn't take much to realise that this salary drawing chairperson will no doubt sit on another committee higher up the scale, surrounded by other salaried chairpeople from their own separate committees. We have created a web of committees and groups, many volunteers and some paid, who spend their entire lives chasing and debating issues that keep them busy, but are unnecessarily complicated. At the last meeting he actually stated, whilst sat next to the salaried chairperson, that he was really struggling as to why there was a committee in existence at all, and hoped that it would become clear as to their role if he stayed longer. What I'm trying to get at is that it really seems as though the common person, brought up to believe in the great democracy we live in, can put all of their life and effort into the democratic web we have built around us, and actually get nowhere fast. But that's okay, because they can feel satisfied once they get the new windows for the village hall, or the extra dog bin they've spent 5 years battling for. It does feel as though the little people are being played with, whilst a large corporate can invite an MP on-board their yacht and change policy in a matter of weeks. This isn't democracy, it's wasting people's time and lives. To use the latest news, the same large corporate can string a tax-inspection by HMRC out a couple of years, wine and dine the inspectors, and still get away with their tax dodging, whereas a plumber found fiddling his tax is sent to gaol, not passing go, and not collecting his £200, as quick as you can say "what democracy".
Ah - that feels better.
Duncan