I am trying to execute it with only certain arguments. I have found
that if I use only "--edge-create --edge-contract", it apparently
works well, but the client fails to understand it. That means: it
appears on red and the load says "Could Not Load Map Data".
Also, to compile the client I had to add the turn plugin to the .pro
file (plugins/client_plugins.pro).
--
María Arias de Reyna Domínguez
Área de Aplicaciones
Emergya Consultoría
Tfno: +34 954 51 75 77 / +34 607 43 74 27
Fax: +34 954 51 64 73
www.emergya.es
Hi John,
> I guess the source.source should be the one endpoint node-ID of source-
> edge.
> So, the below assertion should be check whether the node-ID is valid.
> assert( source.source < m_graph.GetNumberOfNodes() );
> Obviously, this node-ID should be lower than than total nodes number.
Thanks for your answer. Do you think that it does mean that the importer is
skipping some step and is not reordering the nodes?
> In the query consider turn cost, actually the shortest path query is
> between 2 edges.
> So elements in Priority Queue should remember the node and edge both.
That makes total sense.
Thank you very much.
--
María Arias de Reyna Domínguez
Área de Operaciones
Emergya Consultoría
Tfno: +34 954 51 75 77 / +34 607 43 74 27
Fax: +34 954 51 64 73
The turn cost branch is currently not working and-to-end, and was only
used to run benchmarks / sanity tests for this proof-of-concept /
prototype.
Therefore we do not support this branch at the moment ( and until a
proper version is reintegrated into default ), I am sorry to
disappoint you there.
We have skipped on this task so far, since turn restrictions are few
in OSM data and the changes would entail an increase in map data.
Best regards,
Christian
HI Christian,
>
> The turn cost branch is currently not working and-to-end, and was only
> used to run benchmarks / sanity tests for this proof-of-concept /
> prototype.
>
> Therefore we do not support this branch at the moment ( and until a
> proper version is reintegrated into default ), I am sorry to
> disappoint you there.
Thank you very much for your answer. After reading carefully the papers, I
understood much better what was the code, but was unable to fully run it.
> We have skipped on this task so far, since turn restrictions are few
> in OSM data and the changes would entail an increase in map data.
Anyway, congratulations for the project and the research. It has been very
helpful.
> Best regards,
>
> Christian
Regards,
María.