File [quirosgu/PF_Stds/Converted/PF076_pos/181109_PMA_LQG_PF076_B02.mzML] (Line 239,451):
----------
<spectrum index="4270" id="controllerType=4 controllerNumber=1 scan=1" defaultArrayLength="390">
----------
Almost all Thermo spectra have a standard controllerType=0. The fact that your file contains mixed controllerType values means that scan numbers will overlap, which complicates things but isn't the real problem here. The real problem
is that all of your file's controllerType=4 spectra have no standard "ms level" parameter, so our peak list parser is unable to accurately identify them. For instance, all of the normal controllerType=0 spectra do have this parameter:
File [quirosgu/PF_Stds/Converted/PF076_pos/181109_PMA_LQG_PF076_B02.mzML] (Lines 112 - 114):
----------
<spectrum index="1" id="controllerType=0 controllerNumber=1 scan=2" defaultArrayLength="4">
...
<cvParam cvRef="MS" accession="MS:1000511" name="ms level" value="2"/>
----------
At the moment our peak list file parser requires each mzML spectrum to have a parameter of this type so that we can identify each spectrum individually. We are currently looking into this to find a solution, since presumably the semantics
of controllerType=4 spectra justify the omission of this ms level parameter.)
Jeremy Carver
CCMS/MassIVE Software Developer
2)The MassIVE repositories are still private. This could cause problems?
Thank you in advance for your help