Bug in fracture module.

33 views
Skip to first unread message
Assigned to ignat...@gmail.com by lik...@wp.pl

Lukasz Kaczmraczyk

unread,
Oct 10, 2021, 7:17:38 AM10/10/21
to MoFEM Q&A
Ignatios,

I think that could be bug recently introduce when we add NODESET for corner vertices. Also, error message is a bit of cryptic. Can you look at this?

http://cdash.eng.gla.ac.uk/cdash/testDetails.php?test=821387&build=25413

Kind regards,
Lukasz

Lukasz Kaczmraczyk

unread,
Oct 10, 2021, 7:25:47 AM10/10/21
to MoFEM Q&A
I think, that this is obsolete, in this particular test crack is in the volume, so NODES, or BLOCKSET with corner edges is not needed.

I will suggest to remove this,

  if (meshsetMngPtr->checkMeshset(vertexBlockSet, NODESET) &&
      meshsetMngPtr->checkMeshset(vertexBlockSet, BLOCKSET))
    SETERRQ(PETSC_COMM_SELF, MOFEM_INVALID_DATA,
            "There are both BLOCKSET and NODESET with ID equal to input "
            "parameter -vertex_block_set");

To avoid this,
[0] <error> --------------------- MoFEM Error Message --------------------------------------------------- [0] <error> MoFEM version 0.12.1 (MOAB 5.2.0 Petsc Release Version 3.11.3, Jun, 26, 2019 ) [0] <error> MoFEM git commit id dd3b8fb472b0ba2f863ca4b1faf2452065f5e5f0 [0] <error> See http://mofem.eng.gla.ac.uk/mofem/html/ guidelines_bug_reporting.html for bug reporting. [0] <error> Write to https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mofem-group to seek help. [0] <error> There are both BLOCKSET and NODESET with ID equal to input parameter -vertex_block_set [0] <error> #1 setFixEdgesAndCorners() line 1184 in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/UMDevelopFracture/extra_module/src/impl/CPMeshCut.cpp [0] <error> #2 cutMesh() line 1284 in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/UMDevelopFracture/extra_module/src/impl/CPMeshCut.cpp [0] <error> #3 cutRefineAndSplit() line 2299 in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/UMDevelopFracture/extra_module/src/impl/CPMeshCut.cpp [1] <error> #4 main() line 238 in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/UMDevelopFracture/extra_module/crack_propagation.cpp

L.


Lukasz Kaczmraczyk

unread,
Oct 17, 2021, 3:00:25 PM10/17/21
to MoFEM Q&A
Ignatios, we have to fix this as well, next week. 

ignathanas

unread,
Oct 18, 2021, 4:10:41 AM10/18/21
to MoFEM Q&A
Hello Lukasz,

I thought this was fixed by PR #125, was it not?

Ignatios

Lukasz Kaczmraczyk

unread,
Oct 18, 2021, 4:36:15 AM10/18/21
to MoFEM Q&A
Yes. You right. Thx.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages