Amrita's well timed mail is probably the best way to start the new
session and also energise this list. Indeed this list was designed to
provide us with a platform to air our views and queries on the paper
without taking the trouble to travel to the campus, or anywhere else!
The script correction exercise was indeed useful. Examination scripts
- with all their problems - are still , i think, quite a pointer to
the way a subject is being received by the students. And help us to
fine-tune our reading material and pedagogical techniques.
The questions that i found was answered quite well was on partition.
The hindi medium students did particularly well in the Anees Qidwai
answer, though some of them had just mugged up the whole text! I did
not get any script that attempted the Urban dislocation question.
Making of New Delhi was also answered in an average manner - very
average in fact.
Ghalib was ubiquitously attempted and answered badly - usually bad
versions of his life story from the first five pages of the Pavan
Verma text. We definitely have to do something about it. There was
little evidence of reading Naim for Ghalib. Infact i found that Naim
was used much more for the Delhi College answer
The Ralph Russell article, that amrita mentions should be a good
addition. We should add it to the suplementary reading list. I have
another OUP volume on Ghalib edited by Russell and Khurshiul Isalm
(Ghalib: Life and letters), but i think that's too detailed.
I also came across another volume on the Delhi College from OUP. It is
edited by Margrit Pernau (The Delhi College:Traditional Elites, the
Colonial State, and Education before 1857) The collection has an
article by C.M. Naim on the Persian works of Shaikh Imam Baksh Sabbai
and the relationship that subsisted between him, Ghalib and Mohammad
Husain Azad, the trio that contributed substantially to the vitality
of Delhi culture. Maybe we can use this too for the Literary cultures
of Delhi rubric. I admit that i have just glanced through the volume
and not read the article - so i cannot as yet comment on how good it
is. Will do so when i get my hands on the book, and write back to the
list.
For the pre-1857 period, i think that the Narayani Gupta reading
should be supplemented by another one. Contrary to Amrita's
experience, i found that quite a hash had been made of Gupta's text
by the students. And even when i was teaching, many students had
problems with it. Pavan Verma's 2nd chapter (A City of Good Living)
from Ghalib came in handy. Has anybody found any other text?
More later. Please respond with your problems and suggestions.
if you know friends who teach the paper and are not on the list,
please tell them to mail me , or the list with request for
subscription. More members will definitely make for a livelier forum.
Best
Saumya
On 7/14/07, Amrita Tulika <amr...@bol.net.in> wrote:
yes, I had translated some articles last year. But can't say about its
quality. My students had (Hindi Hons students) had kind of improved upon it
when I gave it to them. I will bring it to the meeting that you propose to
have in August.
prabha
_________________________________________________________________
No. 1 Pvt. B - School in South Asia.Click here to know more
http://ss1.richmedia.in/recurl.asp?pid=117