You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mod_gearman
Hi,
Can 0.2ms versus 0.8ms latency to gearmand server explain why 1 worker have almost 10 times more mod_gearman processes? Is there a way to distribute this better?
Regards, Bjorn
Sven Nierlein
unread,
Apr 7, 2026, 5:56:26 AM (10 days ago) Apr 7
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mod_g...@googlegroups.com, bjornf
Hi,
Could be. The daemon wakes all connected servers and the first responding worker gets the job. It will distribute more evenly if
that worker is busy. But as long as the faster one can handle all jobs, it's totally normal that this one does more jobs than
the other.
You could experiment with the gearmand options like round-robin and wakeup numbers to see if this makes a difference. But as long
as this is just a "cosmetic" thing, i wouldn't spend too much time on it.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mod_gearman
Hi,
Well, it's not the cosmetics I am concerned about. It's the uneven load of the workers. You mean that an overloaded worker would not be able to pull(much), once it's overloaded? No risk of one worker getting overloaded?
Regards, Bjorn
Sven Nierlein
unread,
Apr 7, 2026, 9:07:22 AM (10 days ago) Apr 7
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mod_g...@googlegroups.com, bjornf
Right, once the faster server gets a decent load, it will become slower than the other and then the load will be shared more between those two.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mod_gearman" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mod_gearman...@googlegroups.com <mailto:mod_gearman...@googlegroups.com>.