Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Submission for mod-protocols

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Jim Reid

unread,
Mar 5, 1987, 3:54:39 PM3/5/87
to
Path: strath-cs!jim
From: j...@cs.strath.ac.uk (Jim Reid)
Newsgroups: mod.protocols
Subject: Re: Submission for mod-protocols
Message-ID: <4...@stracs.cs.strath.ac.uk>
Date: 5 Mar 87 20:54:36 GMT
References: <8703022138.AA29794@hafro.UUCP>
Reply-To: j...@cs.strath.ac.uk
Distribution: world
Organization: Comp. Sci. Dept., Strathclyde Univ., Scotland.
Lines: 30

In article <8703022138.AA29794@hafro.UUCP> gun...@hafro.UUCP writes:
>Does anyone know of software for handling the X.25 protocol on Unix
>machines ?

The University of British Columbia have added a CCITT socket domain to
4.[23] BSD UNIX to support an X.400 messaging system. It uses the sync.
port of a DMF32 and I understand it should also work on a Sun with one
of the RS232 ports configured for synchronous communication.

Sun also sell X.25 for their SUNlink product: it also provides socket
level communication (based on UBC code?) The SUNlink board has some
intelligence and should manage a good bit of the X.25 processing.

>We would be most interested in specific solutions for the HP 9000
>series, but general information on solutions under Unix will also be
>appreciated.

Well, in section 1m of our HP9000 manuals there is a getx25 command.
This configures getty for reverse pad ports. The entry makes reference
to a HP pad, but I don't know if this is a box or just another card
that slots into the backplane. I'd guess this offloads X.25 and triple-X
from UNIX entirely, so probably doesn't count.

Jim

ARPA: jim%cs.stra...@ucl-cs.arpa, j...@cs.strath.ac.uk
UUCP: j...@strath-cs.uucp, ...!seismo!mcvax!ukc!strath-cs!jim
JANET: j...@uk.ac.strath.cs

"JANET domain ordering is swapped around so's there'd be some use for rev(1)!"

Stephen J. Muir

unread,
Mar 6, 1987, 7:50:21 AM3/6/87
to
Path: dcl-cs!stephen
From: ste...@comp.lancs.ac.uk (Stephen J. Muir)
Newsgroups: mod.protocols
Subject: Re: X.25 for Unix 4.2bsd
Message-ID: <2...@dcl-csvax.comp.lancs.ac.uk>
Date: 6 Mar 87 12:50:17 GMT
References: <8703022138.AA29794@hafro.UUCP> <455*neu...@ean.ubc.cdn>
Reply-To: ste...@comp.lancs.ac.uk (Stephen J. Muir)
Distribution: world
Organization: Department of Computing at Lancaster University, UK.
Lines: 14

In article <455*neu...@ean.ubc.cdn> neu...@mcvax.UUCP (Gerald Neufeld) writes:
>We have developed X.25 for 4.2bsd Unix. The X.25 code uses the protocol
<support within the unix kernel ... interfaced via sockets. It also includes
>PAD support as a client within user process (there is a call out/in daemon).
<The software requires a DMF-32 on a Vax (there is also a DUP-11 driver). It
>also runs on a Sun.

This sounds exactly the same as the code from the University of British
Columbia. In what ways does it differ?
--
EMAIL: ste...@comp.lancs.ac.uk | Post: University of Lancaster,
UUCP: ...!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!stephen | Department of Computing,
Phone: +44 524 65201 Ext. 4120 | Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK.
Project:Alvey ECLIPSE Distribution | LA1 4YR

Gerald Neufeld

unread,
Mar 6, 1987, 4:03:41 PM3/6/87
to
When I mentioned that "We have developed X.25 for 4.2bsd Unix", I should
have said "We, at the University of British Columbia, have ....". The code
I mentioned at that of UBC is one and the same. Sorry for the omission.
0 new messages