Re: [Openstack-devel] python-mockito_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Thomas Goirand]

Hi,

Here's the reply from the FTP masters. Please specify correctly the full
MIT license somewhere (best would be a LICENSE file). Note that if you
want to release Mockito under this license:
http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php

then many people call it the "Expat" license, which removes any
ambiguity with the multiple MIT licenses.

Please let me know when this is fixed, so I can make another attempt at
uploading to Debian.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Openstack-devel] python-mockito_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:05:34 -0400
From: Luke W. Faraone <lfar...@debian.org>
To: Thomas Goirand <zi...@debian.org>
CC: ftpm...@ftp-master.debian.org, PKG OpenStack
<opensta...@lists.alioth.debian.org>

On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 01:50:59PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/19/2013 12:00 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> > «license='MIT',» is not a license declaration.
>
> In the README file attached to the project, line 21, you can read:
> 5. Mockito is licensed under the MIT license
>
> Do you believe that's not enough?

Correct; there are several licenses that MIT has used, and saying "the MIT
license" is not sufficiently unambiguous, despite the OSI determining a
definition of their opinion of what the term means.

Cheers,

Luke