The other day John Taxter in his presentation 'Global impact' said something that really resounded in me and felt it was so true.
Quite ofter we (the institutions or companies) develop mL solutions or education the way we learn...(white-man way...note this is my phrase not John's)
In other words we do not take into consideration that we may have a different learning model to Indigenous communities or other cultures...For years being in communication I have said this to collleagues specifically in a corporate environment when quite ofter we edit, re-edit and redefine communication to the public and consumers so much to make it legally tight...that all context, all human aspect is shed off it and we end up with a policy style advertorial....that really does not make any sense to our target audience.
That got me thinking and did some Google searching and found the following article from Canada
REDEFINING HOW SUCCESS IS MEASURED INABORIGINAL LEARNING IN CANADA
- It is holistic
- It is lifelong
- It is experiential
- It is rooted in Aboriginal languages and cultures
- It is spiritually oriented
- It is a communal activity
- It integrates Aboriginal and Western knowledge
How often do we pause in our planning when designing education and take the end-user learning style preference into consideration?
Enough of my waffling!
ET